ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO DE LA EVOLUCIÓN Y COMPLICACIONES EN QUEMADURAS ELÉCTRICAS E ÍGNEAS / Comparative study of the evolution and complications in electrical and igneous burns
Abstract
RESUMEN
Se comparó la evolución y complicaciones en quemaduras eléctricas e ígneas en pacientes atendidos en un hospital universitario de la ciudad de Maracaibo. La investigación fue de tipo descriptivo, exploratorio, realizada con un diseño longitudinal, prospectivo, que incluyó un total de 50 pacientes quemados, 25 pacientes con quemaduras eléctricas y 25 por quemaduras ígneas que se utilizaron como control ingresados en el Servicio de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Maxilofacial entre 01 de enero de 2015 al 30 de junio de 2017. El porcentaje de superficie corporal quemada en los pacientes con quemaduras eléctricas fue de 15,32 +/- 10,63% y en los pacientes con quemaduras ígneas de 23,72 +/- 16,29%, con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ambos grupos (p: 0,017<0,05). Al evaluar las complicaciones en los pacientes con quemaduras eléctricas e ígneas, se observó un mayor número de complicaciones en los pacientes con quemaduras eléctricas, con un total de 12 complicaciones en pacientes con quemaduras eléctricas y tres complicaciones en los pacientes con quemaduras ígneas (p: 0,0037<0,05). Las quemaduras eléctricas al compararla con las quemaduras ígneas se asocian a una mayor morbilidad, y es necesaria una vigilancia estricta en estos pacientes.
ABSTRACT
The evolution and complications of electric and igneous burns were compared in patients treated at a university hospital in the city of Maracaibo. The investigation was descriptive, exploratory, made with a longitudinal, prospective design, that included a total of 50 burned patients, 25 patients with electrical burns and 25 with igneous burns that were used like control entered in the Surgery, Reconstructive and Maxillofacial Service of the University Hospital from Maracaibo between 01 of January from 2015 to the 30 of June of 2017. The percentage of burned corporal surface in the patients with electrical burns was of 15, 32 + / - 10, 63% and in the patients with igneous burns of 23, 72 + / - 16, 29%, with a statistically significant difference between both groups (p: 0,017<0,05). When evaluating the complications in the patients with electrical and igneous burns, were observed a greater number of complications in the patients with electrical burns, with a total of 12 complications in patients with electrical burns and 3 complications in patients with igneous burns (p: 0.0037 <0.05). The electrical complications when comparing it with the igneous burns are accompanied by a greater morbidity, and is necessary a strict monitoring in the patients who present these injuries. Electrical burns, when compared to igneous burns, are associated with increased morbidity, and strict monitoring is necessary in these patients.
Downloads
References
Arnoldo B., Klein M., Gibran N. (2006). Practice guidelines for the management of electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res. Jul-Aug; 27(4):439- 47.
Arnoldo B., Purdue G., Kowalske K., Helm P.,Burris A.,Hunt J. (2004). Electrical injuries: a 20- year review. J Burn Care Rehabil. 25:479-484.
Bhavsar P., Rathod K., Rathod D., Chamania C. (2013). Utility of serum creatinine, creatine kinase and urinary myoglobin in detecting acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis in trauma and electrical burns patients. Indian J Surg.; 75(1):17-21.
Bracho J., Pineda G., de Boscán T., Soto R., Soto L., Ortigoza J., Villasmil J., Vargas D. (2006). Incidencia de quemaduras eléctricas y secuelas funcionales discapacitantes en el año 2005. Cir PlastReconst Venez. 2006; 8(2):64-66.
Byrom R., Word E., Tewksbury Ch., Edlich R. (1984). Epidemiology of flame injuries. Burns. 11: 1-10.
Handschin A., Vetter S., Jung F., Guggenheim M., Künzi W., Giovanoli P. (2009). A Case- Matched Controlled Study on High-Voltage. Electrical Injuries vs Thermal Burns. Burn Care Rehabil. 30:400-407.
Kopp J., Loos B., Spilker G., Horch R. (2004). Correlation between serum creatinine kinase levels and extent of muscle damage in electrical burns. Burns. 30:680-683.
Lee R., Zhang D., Hannig J. (2000). Biophysical injury mechanisms in electrical shock trauma. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2:477-509.
Nichter L., Bryant C., Kenney J., Morgan R., Tribble C., Rodeheaver G., Edlich R. (1984). Injuries due to commercial electric current. J Burn Care Rehabil.; 5:124-137.
Ogilvie M., Panthaki Z. (2008). Electrical burns of the upper extremity in the pediatric population. J Craniofac Surg. 19(4):1040-1046.
Salehi S., Fatemi M., Asadi K., Shoar S., Ghazarian A., Samim R. (2014). Electrical injury in construction workers: A special focus on injury with electrical power. Burns. 40: 300- 304.
Soto C., Albornoz C., Peña V., Arriagada C., Hurtado J., Villegas J. (2013). Prognostic factors for ampùtation in severe burn patients. Burns. 39: 126-129.
Vierhapper M., Lumenta D., Beck H., Keck M., Kamolz L., Frey M. (2011). Electrical injury: a long-term analysis with review of regional differences. Ann Plast Surg. Jan; 66(1):43-6
Copyright
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is submitted, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work upon acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately enter into additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is licensed under the license:
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
_.jpg)
_(1).jpg)
1.jpg)
