Kazakhstan As A Model For The Study Of Political Culture In A Poly-Cultural Society

• L. Ilimkhanova
• K. Adilova
• R. Nurtazina
• B. Kalaganov
• S. Baimoldina
• D. Bugybay

Palabras clave: modern state, social environment, determinants, political culture, relationship, institute, ethnic group, individual behavior, value systems

Resumen

Every nation, to one extent or another, has the right to its own opinion and promotion of its own vision of political ideals and value contents. In this context, there should not go without mention the other countries’ negative experience on their way towards modernization and transition from the industrial to post-industrial structure. Accent should be put on the fact that even the best world examples disregarding the state national characteristics will not be accepted by the society, resulting in hostile attitude growth. Such changes are dangerous enough for Russia as a multinational state.Wrong interpretation of the methods to improve the population quality of life might lead to interethnic or inter-religious hostility, discrediting the democracy concept itself and inciting regress in the country development process. According to many researchers’ opinion, the contemporary government is one of the most important research institutes of political culture determinants. Government appears as a result of the nation long-lasting historical development, its changes representing effective factors hindering or accelerating certain individual political culture patterns emergence. . Nevertheless, a detailed overview of the respective issue requires studying the entry of the “political culture” concept, the interaction of this phenomenon determinants, and becoming aware of the significance of government as an institute of research on the political culture elements and transformations in terms of the society impact and attitude.

Citas

Almond G., Verba S. (“Civic culture and democracy stability” // Polis.1992. No. 4);

VasyutenkovI. V. (“Social health of the individual within the po- ly-cultural educational environment” // 2008);

Vyatr Е. (“Sociology of political relations” – М., 1979);

GadjievК.S. («Political science: Teaching guide» – М., 1995);

Gudimenko D.V. (“Political culture in Russia: continuity of ages”, Polis, 1994. No. 2);

Keyzerov N.М. (“On the correlation between the civic and political cultures. Sociologic and political sciences”, 1991, No.7);

Krasilishikov V.А. (Round-table conference “Globalization and democratization”, Moscow, 1997);

Pivovarov I.S. (“Political culture: Methodological study ISI RAS” – М., 1996);

PikalovG.А. (“Political culture. Teaching guide” – St. Petersburg, 2001);

Smorgunov L.V. (“Network-based methodology of research on politics” // Political analysis: Reports of the Empiric and Political Studies St. Petersburg State University. St. Petersburg, 2001)

ShulindinB.P. (“Historical way of Russia in the context of the civi- lizational and formational approaches”//Humanities and social knowledge No. 2 2001);

RakacevV.N. (“Demographic consequences of the collectivism policy in North Caucasus and data distortion”).

All-Union Population Census, 1939. Major Results. M., 19, Jirom- skayaV.B.