Strengthening Women’s Rights In Law Through Supreme Court Number 3 Year 2017 Regulation In Divorce Cases In The Religious Court
Resumen
PERMA Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Judging Women’s Cases Against the Law is a form of protection for women against all acts of discrim- ination and this can enrich the quantity and quality of the judges related to gender equality. This research used the juridical-empirical research method. The results of the study indicate that there is no difference between before the enactment of PERMA Number 3 of 2017 and before in the “Cerai Gugat” case. The judges have not optimally implemented PERMA Number 3 of 2017. There are 3 obstacles involved in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017: (1) the Judge’s consideration if the wife submits divorce papers to the husband by considering them nusyuz or rebellious in accordance with the rules of fiqh, (2) there is no optimisation of proof and (3) the husband is not present at the hearing processes, so the Judge has difficulty getting holistic information.Citas
ALI, A. 2009. Revealing Legal Theory and Judicial Prudence. Kenca- na Prenada Media Group. Jakarta. Indonesia.
ALI, Z. 2011. Philosophy of Law. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. Indonesia. ARIFIN, J. 2017. “The Hight Rate Divorce Issued in The Perkanbaru Religious Court and its Relevance to The Concept of Geder Equal- ity”. Marwah: Jurnal Perempuan, Agama dan Jender. Vol. 16, No 2: 141 – 155.
ARTO, M. 2017. The Discovery of Islamic Law for the Realization of Justice. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. Indonesia.
ASSHIDDIQIE, J. 2004. Indonesian Constitution and Constitution- alism. Rajawali Press. Jakarta. Indonesia.
CHOIRI, A. 2009. “Blessing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 For Women and Children Who Become Victims of Divorce”. Article on The Su- preme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Directorate General of the Religious Courts. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/ publikasi/artikel/berkah-perma-nomor-3-tahun-2017-bagi-kaum- perempuan-dan-anak-yang-menjadi-korban-perceraian-oleh-a- choiri-25-9
CHIONGSON, R.A. 2010. Are Our Increasing Gender Equality?. A Handbook for CEDAW-based Legal Reviews. UN WOMEN East and Southeast Asia Regional Office. Bangkok. Thailand. FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. 2011. Social Sciences Legal System Per- spective. Nusa Media. Bandung. Indonesia.
ESTIN, A.L. 2017. “Marriage and Divorce Conflicts In Internation- al Perspective”. Duke Journal Of Comparative & International Law. Vol. 27: 485-517.
HAMAMI, T. 2003. Position and The existence of the Religious Court in Legal System in Indonesia. PT Alumni Bandung. Indonesia. KHUMAS, A., RETNOWATI, S., PRAWITASARI, J.E. 2015. “Model Explaining the Intention of Divorced Muslim Women in South Su- lawesi”. Jurnal Psikologi. Vol. 42, No 3: 189 – 206.
MATRAIS, S. 2008. “Independence of Religious Court in The Per- spective of The Religious Court Law”. Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 15, No 1: 121 – 144.
PUSPITA, D. R., DHARMA, P., & IDANATI, R. 2016. “Model of Op- timizing the Role of Chairmen of Neighborhood in Preventing Di- vorce”. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan, dan Politik. Vol. 29, No 4: 181-190. SUNARSI, D., YUHERMAN, & SUMIYATI. 2018. “Effectiveness of Mediation on Divorce Cases at Class IA Religious Courts on Java Island”. Jurnal Hukum Media Bakti. Vol.2, No 2: 138-151.
SUADI, A. 2018. “The Role of Religious Courts in Protecting the Rights of Women and Children Through Impaired and Implementa- ble Decisions”. Jurnal hukum dan Peradilan. Vol. 7, No 3: 353-363. SUPREME COURT REGULATION NO. 3 OF 2017. 2017. Concern- ing Guidelines for Judging Women’s Cases Dealing with Law.
