Organizing Students’ Independent Work under the Guidance of a Foreign Language Teacher at the University

• Bakhytgul Assylbekovna Zhetpisbayeva
• Bikesh Revovna Ospanova
• Gulmira Muratovna Baideldinova
• Zhanat Amantayevna Azimbayeva
• Alma Akynzhanovna Akynzhanova

Palabras clave: foreign language, independent work under the guidance of a teacher, methodological guide, profession-oriented foreign language, spe- cialists, technology of organizing independent work

Resumen

The article examines the actual problem of undergraduate students’ poor proficiency in foreign languages at non-linguistic universities. The purpose of this article is to develop and to test a technology for organizing students’ independent work under the guidance of a teacher of foreign language at a technical university, facilitating their perception of profession-oriented in- formation. The study was based on the existing technology and the devel- oped by us technology of organizing students’ independent work under the guidance of a teacher in teaching English as a foreign language in the first year at a polytechnic university. The study involved two groups: the con- trol group was engaged in the existing technology of organizing students’ independent work under the guidance of a teacher, and the experimental group had classes on the developed by us technology of organizing students’ independent work under the guidance of a teacher. As a result of the work carried out at the developed by us technology of organizing students’ inde- pendent work under the guidance of a teacher which mandatory component is authentic foreign texts in specialties,special profession-oriented tasks for simple common texts of a foreign language and controlling-measuring profession-oriented materials, it was revealed that the proposed profession-oriented technology of organizing students’ independent work under the guidance of a teacher contributed to better proficiency and understanding of profession-oriented texts by stu- dents of technical specialties.

Citas

ABDYGAPPAROVA, S.B., AKHMETOVA, G.K., IBATULLIN, S.R., KUSAINOV, A.A., MYRZALIYEV, B.A., & OMIRBAYEV, S.M. 2004. Osnovy kreditnoy sistemy obucheniya v Kazakhstane. Almaty: Kazak Universitetі.

ASANOV, N.A., KALDIYAROV, D.A., & MINAZHEVA, G.S. 2004. Or- ganizatsiya obrazovatelnogo protsessa na osnove kreditnoy tekhnologii. Almaty: Kazak universiteti.

BESPALKO, V.P. 1989. Slagayemyye pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii. Moscow: Pedagogika.

BRINKWORTH, M.E., MCINTYRE, J., JURASCHEK, A.D., & GEHL- BACH, H. 2017. Teacher-student relationships: The positives and neg- atives of assessing both perspectives. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 55, 24-38..

BRONSON, S. 2016. Autonomy support environment and autonomous motivation on nursing student academic performance: an exploratory anal- ysis. Nurse Education Today, 44, 103-108.

BULYKO, A.N. 2006. Bolshoy slovar inostrannykh slov: 35 tysyach slov. Moscow: Martin.

HEDGES, H.V. 2017. Challenges in Building Usable Knowledge in Education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11, 1-21. HOLLANDER, P. 2018. Explaining the Counterculture. Academic Ques- tions, 31, 23-32.

KIRYUSHKINA, A.G. n. d.. Modelirovaniye samostoyatelnoy raboty stu- dentov s ispolzovaniyem novykh obrazovatelnykh tekhnologiy. Retrieved July 2, 2019 from: www.orenport.ru/docs/281/work_stud/Members/Kiry- chkina.htm.

KLARIN, M.V. 1989. Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya. Moscow: Prosve- shcheniye.

KUSAINOV, A.A. OMIRBAYEV, A.A., & KARPYKOV, S.S. 2010. Kreditnaya sistema obucheniya v Kazakhstane: teoriya. metodologiya. praktika i obobshcheniye opyta: monografiya. Almaty: KazGASA. LIANG, H.-Y., & KELSEN, B. 2018. Influence of Personality and Moti- vation on Oral Presentation Performance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Re- search, 2018, 47, 755-776. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007 %2Fs10936-017-9551-6.

LIKHACHEV, B.G. 1992. Pedagogika. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye. MACLELLAN, E. 2016. Agents pedagogical: Bootstrapping reflexive practice through the psychological resources of self-agency. Journal of Pedagogy, 7, 79-96.

MOURATIDIS, A., MICHOU, A., & VASSIOU, A. 2017. Adolescents’ autonomous functioning and implicit theories of ability as predictors of their school achievement and week-to-week study regulation and well-be- ing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 56-66.

NASSER-ABU ALHIJA, F. 2017. Teaching in higher education: good teaching through students’ lens. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 4-12.

NILSON, O.A. 1976. Teoriya i praktika samostoyatelnoy raboty uchash- chikhsya. Tallin.

OZHEGOV, S. I. 1988. Slovar russkogo yazyka: Okolo 57 tys. slov. Mos- cow: Rus.yaz.

PIDKASISTYY, P.I. 1980. Samostoyatelnaya poznavatelnaya deyatel- nost shkolnikov v obuchenii. Teoretiko-eksperimentalnoye issledovaniye. Moscow: Pedagogika.

SELEVKO, G.K. 1998. Sovremennyye obrazovatelnyye tekhnologii: Uchebnoye posobiye. Moscow: Narodnoye obrazovaniye.

SHAHRIARI, H., SHADLOO, F., & ANSARIFAR, A. 2018. An Examina- tion of Relative Clauses in Argumentative Essays Written by EFL Learn- ers. Journal of Language and Education, 4, 77-87.

SLASTENIN, V.A. 1997. Pedagogika. Moscow: Shkola-Press.

Slovar inostrannykh slov. 2012. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk.

UNT, I.E. (1990). Individualizatsiya i differentsiatsiya obucheniya. Mos- cow: Prosveshcheniye.

USHAKOV, D.N. 2008. Bolshoy tolkovyy slovar sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: 180000 slov i slovosochetaniy. Moscow: Alta-Print.

WURF, G.C. 2018. Culture and personality in international schools: are trait differences in students’ personalities attenuated or amplified. Intercul- tural Education, 29, 418-43