Informatively of metonymy in Arabic rhetoric lesson

• Zeena Ghani Abdul Hussein Al-Khafaji

Resumen

Textual science – as researchers and scholars see it – is one of the latest language science branches and is involved in the chain of subjective and methodological evolution. This science was established according to the works of a German group of researchers back in 1968 under the supervision of Hartmann and Weinrich, as Hartmann convened the first conference under his guidance to discuss text language and established a new lingual and textual research center later. These beginnings started to make progress in the seventies by (Van Djik) who called for the importance of this science provided that the grammatical description includes the relations between sentences on two levels: Superficial and profound. The dream of this matter has been realized by the American (Robert de Beaugrande) after laying seven standards for textuality, one of them is the informativity(1) as he classified them into two closely text-related standards which are (Cohesion and Coherence), two psychological standards (Situationality and Intertex- tuality); left the two standards related to the producer and recipient of the text which are (Intentionality and acceptability) without classification as well leaving the (informativity) for the perception of the producer and recipient(2). Researchers confirmed that there is a strong bond between textual science and rhetoric, as (Van Djik) saw that historical event of the textual science is clear through our careful examination of the general direction of old rhetoric which went to describe texts and their distinguished functions. Rhetoric is connected to particular stylistic forms and models, while (Harweg) saw that Rhetoric and stylistics are previous branches promising of textual science. Here comes the importance of the research entitled (informativity of meton- ymy in Arabic rhetoric lesson) in its attempt to uncover the high informative efficiency of metonymy based on what it conceals and contains in terms of meanings and images, therefore it has required two axes preceded by an intro- duction and followed by a conclusion that shows the important research result. The first axis is allocated to talk about the informative origins of Arabic rheto- ric and the other axis is allocated to discuss metonymy informativity.

Citas

Asrar Albalagha Fi Elm Albaian, Abdulqaher abdulrahman Al-Jurjani (471 A.H), corrected and commented on by Mr. Mohammed Rasheed Ridha, Al-Qahira library, 6th issue, 1959.

Ishkalitay Algharaba Fi Shi'r Abi Tamam: (a read between the old criticism and vision of the new one), Dr. Ahmed Abdulrahman Saleem, Islamic Sciences College Magazine, University of Mosul, 5th volume, 10th issue, 2010.

Osool Alma'ayeer Alnasiya Fi Alturath Alnaqdi Wa Albalaghi Inda Alarab, Abdulkhaliq Farhan Shaheen, Thesis, College of Literature, University of Kufa, 2012.

Aliblaghiya fi Alshahed Albalaghi (study and analysis), Nader Abdul- rahman Mohammed Alwaqfi, University of Mo'ta, 2007.

Bayan wa al-tabyin, Abo Othman Amr Ben Bahar Al-Jahiz (255 A.H), investigated and explained by Mohammed Haroon, Alkhanchi library in Egypt and Almuthanna library in Baghdad, 2nd edition, 1960.

Tahreer Altahbeer Fi Sina'at Alsher Wa Baian Ijaz AlQuran, Ibn Abi Al'isba Almasri (654 A.H), presentation and investigation of Dr. Jafni Moham- med Shara, Commission of reviving Islamic culture, United Arab Republic, Higher Committee for Islamic Affairs, Cairo, 1963.

Altakhyeel Wa Binaa Alansaq Aldilalia Nahwa Muqaraba Dilaliya, Saeed Jabbar, Roya House for Publishing and Distribution, 2013.

Altalaqi Wa Alibdaa, reads on old Arabic criticism, Prof. Dr. Mahmo- od Draba, Hamada Institute for University studies, publishing and distribution, Jordan, 2003.

Alkhetab Albalaghi, Khaleel Oudah, Chosen researches, reviewed by Saleh Khaleel Abo Isbaa and Ghassan Abdulkhaleq, no edition, University of Philadelphia posts, Oman, 1998.

Dala'el Al-Ijaz, Abdulqaher Al-Jurjani (471 A.H), reviewed and com- mented on by Mahmood Mohammed Shaker, 3rd edition, Alkhanchi library, Cairo.

Rasa'il Al-Jahiz, Resalat Nafi Altashbeeh, investigation of Abdulsa- lam Haroon, Al-Jajiz library, Beirut, Lebanon.

Alsoora Alfn'niya Fi Alturath Alnaqdi Wa Albalaghi, Dr. Jaber Asfoor, Arabic Cultural Center, Casablanca, Morocco, 3rd edition, 1992.

Elm lughat Alnas: Alnathariya Wa Altatbeeq, Dr. Azza Shibl, Aladab press, Cairo, 1st edition, 2007.

s 14. Ghareeb Al-hadeeth, Abdulrahman Ben jawzy, investigation of Abdulmo'ti Ameen, Alkutub Alilmiya house, 2004.

Al-Sina'atain book: Alketab Wa Alsher, Abo Hilal Al-Askari (395 A.H), investigated by Ali Mohammed Albajawi, Mohammed Abulfadhel Ibrahem, Ihyaa Alkutub Alarabiya, Essa Albabi Alhalabi et Al, 1st edition,1952.

Minhaj Albulaghaa Wa Siraj Aludabaa, by Abi AlhasanHazim Al-Qartajni (684 A.H), presented and investigated by Mohammed Alhabbeb Ben Alkhoja, Arab books house, Tunisia, 3rd edition, 2008.

Almuwazana bain Abi Tamam Wa Al-Buhturi, Al-Amidi (370 A.H), investigated by Ahmed Saqr, Alkhanchi library, 1994.

Text, speech and procedure, Robert de Beaugrande, translated by Tamam Hassan, 2nd edition, Alam Alkutub, Cairo, 2007.

Alnaqd Al'lughawi Inda Alarab Hata Nehayat Alqern Alsab'e Alhijri, Dr. Neamah Raheem Alazzawi, Alhurriya House for Printing and Publishing, Baghdad, 1978.