Perspectives Of The Diagnostic And Development Of Art Endowments And Art Disciplines’ Future Teachers
Resumen
The research’s relevance is determined by the importance of assessing the trans- formation of methods of artistic teaching in the Soviet and post-Soviet period, as well as searching for effective methods for diagnosing the artistic endowments of young people, which determines the perspectives of the development of high art education, and as a result the professional qualities of future art teachers. In this connection, this article is aimed at revealing the main characteristics of artistic endowments, developing a system of exercises-tests. It helps to identify artistically gifted and talented students. The leading approach to the study of this problem is the introduction in the academic process of the university of a set of effective methods, such as acceleration (a technique aimed at accelerating the development of acquired artistic skills); (method of complication of compositional, graphic and pictorial tasks) and enrichment (the method of inclusion in an active artistic group activity.) The article presents a diagnostic tool on the basis of which the main com- ponents of the student’s artistic talent are revealed, recommendations on work with artistically gifted youth in higher education. The materials of the article are of practical value for teachers in the field of art education.Citas
Barron, F., Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
Bender, L. (1938). A visual motor Gestalt test and its clinical use. American Orthopsychiatric Association, 3.
Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B., Bogoyavlenskaya, M.Ye. (2005). Psik- hologiya odarennosti: ponyatie, vidy, problemy, 1 [ Psychology of giftedness: concept, types, problems, 1]. Moscow: MIOO.
Bono de, E. (1997). Serious creation. Basic modern concepts of cre- ativity and giftedness. Moscow: Young Guard, 328-348. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A sys- tems view of creativity. In Ed. R.J. Sternberg. The nature of creativity. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 325–339.
Kara, Zh. Yu., Omelyanenko Ye.V. (2010). Vzaimosvyaz tvorchest- va i smysloobrazovaniya kak put razvitiya kreativnoy lichnosti [The relationship of meaning and creativity as a way of development of creative personality]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo Federalnogo universiteta. Pedagogicheskie nauki, 12.
Kireenko V. I. (1959). Psikhologiya sposobnostey k izobrazitelnoy deyatelnosti.[ Psychology of abilities to fine art activity]. Moscow: APN RSFSR.
Manual, H.T. (1919). Talent in drawing: An experimental study of the use of tests to discover special ability. School and Home Educa- tion, 3. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company. Melik-Pashaev, A. A. (2000). Mir khudozhnika [The world of an artist]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
Melik-Pashaev, A.A., Novlyanskaya, Z.N., Adaskina, A.A., Kudina, G.G., Chubuk, N.F. (2006). Psikhologicheskie osnovy khudozhest- vennogo razvitiya [Psychological basis of artistic]. Moscow: MGPU. Meyer, M.F. (1911). The Fundamental Laws of Human Behavior: Lectures on the Foundations of Any Mental or Social Science. Bos- ton: Richard G. Badger.
Milgram, R.M., Khong, Yu. (2000). Validnost izmereniy profession- alnykh interesov odarennoy molodezhi vo vneshkolnoy sfere [Va- lidity of measurement of professional interests of talented youth in extracurricular activities. Creativity in art – the art of creativity]. Moscow: Nauka, 199-214.
Revesz, G. (1952). Talent und Genie. Bern: Francke.
Rybalka, V. (2011). Definitions of giftedness, talent, genius person- ality: classic and contemporary methodological approaches. Gifted child, 2, 16-38.
Sirotyuk, A.S. (2014). Diagnosis of giftedness. Moscow: Direct-Me- dia.
Tartarashvili, T.A. (1988). Reference system of preparation of the intellectual elite in the United States. Moscow.
Teplov, B. (1961). Problems of individual differences. Moscow, 9-20.
