Palabras que perduran: un análisis del comportamiento lingüístico en situaciones de emergencia

• Anna Marmulyak Department of Ukrainian Studies and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Psychology and Social Protection, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-5850
• Anzhela Posokhova Department of Language Skills Training (main affiliation), Lviv State University of Internal Affairs; Associate Professor at the Department of Ukrainian Studies and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Psychology and Social Protection, Lviv State University of Life Safety; Lviv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-0195
• Tetiana Lypchenko Department of Ukrainian Studies and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Psychology and Social Protection, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-3372
• Oksana Pylypets Department of Ukrainian Studies and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Psychology and Social Protection, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-3325
• Nadiia Salamin Department of Ukrainian Studies and Intercultural Communication, Faculty of Psychology and Social Protection, Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-9918

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21174152

Palabras clave: resiliencia del equipo, valor, comunidad territorial, digitalización, contenido

Resumen

Basándose en un análisis comparativo de la experiencia ucraniana e internacional (guerra  a  gran  escala,  pandemia  de COVID-19, desastres  naturales), el artículo revela importantes transformaciones en el comportamiento del discurso en tiempos de crisis. Los resultados muestran que el discurso de las situaciones de emergencia se caracteriza por el predominio de actos de habla directivos, la violación sistemática de las máximas comunicativas de Grice y la transición de las redes sociales al estatus de plataforma integrada para la comunicación de emergencia y la estabilización psicológica. El artículo también destaca los mecanismos lingüísticos de la guerra de información, en particular las tecnologías manipuladoras (minimización del lenguaje, sabotaje semántico, ruido informativo) y las estrategias eficaces para su neutralización basadas en los principios de precisión, verificación y consolidación del discurso. Los datos obtenidos pueden utilizarse para optimizar la comunicación de crisis de las instituciones gubernamentales, los medios de comunicación y las ONG.

Citas

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/howtodothingswit0000aust

Austin, L., Fisher Liu, B., & Jin, Y. (2012). How audiences seek out crisis information: Exploring the socialmediated crisis communication model. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498

Bower, C. (2024). Ukraine’s wartime digitalization efforts: 2022 to 2024. Los Alamos National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29088.85763

Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280153860_Ongoing_Crisis_Communication_Planning_Managing_and_Responding

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (2019). National emergency communications plan. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/19_0924_CISA_ECD-NECP-2019_1.pdf

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (2020). Communication on COVID19: Lessons learned and recommendations. https://doi.org/10.2900/151256

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002057

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Hansson, S., Orru, K., Siibak, A., Bäck, A., Krüger, M., Gabel, F., & Morsut, C. (2020). Communicationrelated vulnerability to disasters: A heuristic framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, Article 101931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101931

Heath, R. L., & O’Hair, H. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891629

Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (Eds.). (2007). Discourse, war and terrorism. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24

Humanitarian Response Platform. (2021). Humanitarian response plan. https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/OCHAHUMRESPLAN2022_161221.pdf

Ilychok, B., Karkovska, V., Dzyurakh, Y., & Marmulyak, A. (2023). Changes in demographic security of Ukraine as a key indicator of socioeconomic stability. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(49), 350–360. https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/article/view/4020

Kodera, Y., Hayashimoto, N., Tamaribuchi, K., Noguchi, K., Moriwaki, K., Takahashi, R., Morimoto, M., Okamoto, K., & Hoshiba, M. (2021). Developments of the nationwide earthquake early warning system in Japan after the 2011 Mw 9.0 TohokuOki earthquake. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, Article 726045. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.726045

Micheli, M., Redmiles, E. M., & Hargittai, E. (2020). Help wanted: Young adults’ sources of support for questions about digital media. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1655–1672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602666

Oleniuk, O. V. (2016). Verbalization of the concept danger in magazine advertising discourse. Scientific Notes of the National University “Ostroh Academy”, Series “Philology”, 63(63), 149–152. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-410731

Palen, L., & Hughes, A. L. (2018). Social media in disaster communication. In H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, & J. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (2nd ed., pp. 497–518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_24

Sandman, P. M. (2012). The Peter M. Sandman risk communication website. https://www.psandman.com

Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Praeger. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400629112

Shevchenko, I. (2022). American social media on the RussiaUkraine war: A multimodal analysis. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 25, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2022-25-05

Slovic, P., & Ball, D. J. (2011). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. Energy & Environment, 22(6), 835–836. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.22.6.835

Tehməzova, G. (2025). Lingvopragmatic features of political discourse. Terminology Issues, 1, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.59849/2663-8967.2025.1.121

Tryhuba, A., Malanchuk, O., Tryhuba, I., & Marmulyak, A. (2024). Decision support system for initiating projects of medical and social development in regions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on IT Project Management (ITPM 2024) (pp. 204–218). Bratislava, Slovakia. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85197277242

Verbytska, L., Babii, I., Konivitska, T., Kulchytska, M., & Khlypavka, H. (2025). Emergency speaking communication: Experience from the USA and Europe. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 18(10), 145–154. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5285737