Interacción entre autoridades públicas e instituciones de la sociedad civil en el ámbito de la prevención y combate a la corrupción

Liudmyla  Antonova; Dmytro  Mishchenko; Ivan  Bandura; Vahif  Abdullayev; Oleksandr   Dolhyi

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6555412

Liudmyla Antonova Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University. Mykolaiv, Ukraine
Dmytro Mishchenko University of Customs and Finance. Dnipro, Ukraine
Ivan Bandura Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Kyiv, Ukraine
Vahif Abdullayev Black Sea National University named after P. Mohyla, Mykolaiv, Ukraine.
Oleksandr Dolhyi Ukrainian School of Government. Irpin, Ukraine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6555412

Palabras clave: Actividades anticorrupción, Administración pública, Instituciones de la sociedad civil, Corrupción, Autoridades públicas

Resumen

El artículo corrobora la relevancia del estudio para la Ucrania moderna de la interacción de las autoridades públicas y las instituciones de la sociedad civil en el campo de la prevención y lucha contra la corrupción. Se realiza el análisis de las últimas investigaciones temáticas y publicaciones. El documento resume y destaca las principales direcciones y formas de mejorar la interacción de las autoridades públicas y las instituciones de la sociedad civil en el campo de la prevención y el combate a la corrupción e identifica las más efectivas y prometedoras. Se identifican las principales razones de la interacción destructiva entre las autoridades públicas y las instituciones de la sociedad civil (bajo nivel de conciencia legal, falta de mecanismos efectivos de retroalimentación entre la sociedad y el estado). Se dan instrucciones temáticas sobre una mayor interacción anticorrupción del estado (autoridades públicas) con la sociedad civil (instituciones de la sociedad civil). Se presenta un modelo conceptual del mecanismo de interacción entre el Estado y la sociedad civil en el campo de la prevención y combate a la corrupción. El artículo formula y resuelve un problema científico de actualidad en el campo de la administración pública, que consiste en resumir y destacar las principales direcciones y formas de mejorar la interacción de las autoridades públicas y las instituciones de la sociedad civil en la prevención y lucha contra la corrupción e identificar las más eficaces y prometedoras.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Liudmyla Antonova , Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University. Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Department of Accounting and Audit, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

Dmytro Mishchenko , University of Customs and Finance. Dnipro, Ukraine

Doctor of Sciences in Public Administration, Department of State, Local and Corporate Finance, University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine

Ivan Bandura , Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Kyiv, Ukraine

Candidate of Sciences in Public Administration, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine

Vahif Abdullayev , Black Sea National University named after P. Mohyla, Mykolaiv, Ukraine.

Black Sea National University named after P. Mohyla. Mykolaiv, Ukraine.

Oleksandr Dolhyi, Ukrainian School of Government. Irpin, Ukraine

Department for Development of Professional Development Programs and Needs Analysis of the Training Center, Ukrainian School of Government, Irpin, Ukraine

Citas

Adilov, N. (2016). Comparative analysis of the main aspects of the implementation of international law in the field of combating corruption in the legislation of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Evrazijskaja advokatura, 6 (25), 87-94. [in Russian].

Bagmet, K. (2018). Regulation of Institutional Changes in the Social Sector of the National Economy: Conceptual Approach. Economics Ecology Socium, 2(4), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2018.2.4-10

Bahoo, S., Alon, I. & Paltrinieri, A. (2020). Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda. International Business Review, 29 (4). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593119309473.

Bolya, A. & Gillandersb, R. (2018). Anti-corruption policy making, discretionary power and institutional quality: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 152, 314-327.

Bukanov, H., Kolesnyk, A., Tashkinova, O., Kotlubai, V., & Koval, V. (2019). Social marketing in public administration of social service institutions. Revista Genero & Direito, 8 (6), 457-468.

Dzhabiev, R. (2012). Shadow economy and corruption in Azerbaijan. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 7, 84-91. [in Russian].

Gajdareva, I. (2013). Anti-corruption in the civil service system as the main anti-corruption mechanism. Jekonomika i socium, 4 (9), 25-32. [in Russian].

Gamgani, L. & Tonnac, A. (2020). Evolving measures to prevent and repress corruption in France. Revue Francaise d'Administration Publique, 175 (3), 677-691.

Havkalova, N. & Hruzd, M. (2014). Interaction of public authorities and civil society institutions. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky (demohrafiia, ekonomika pratsi, sotsialna ekonomika i polityka), 10 (160), 281-290. [in Ukrainian].

Jargomskaja, N., Belokurova, E. & Nozhenko, M. (2004). Why NGOs and authorities need each other. Models of interaction in the regions of the Northwest. Public Policy: Soft Security Issues in the Baltic Region. SPb.: Norma, Moscow, Russia. [in Russian].

Kabanov, P. (2012). The main forms of interaction of civil society institutions with local government bodies in the field of combating corruption. Aktualnye voprosy praktiki mestnogo samoupravlenija v Rossijskoj Federacii, 1, 25-29. [in Russian].

Kabanov, P. (2019). Social integration and development of ethnocultures in the Eurasian space. Thematic area “Civil society against corruption” collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Barnaul, Russia, 58-65. [in Russian].

Kolosova, N. & Ivanjuk, O. (2011). Civil society and the state in the fight against corruption. Nauka i obrazovanie: hozjajstvo i jekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie, 10 (16), 160-167. [in Russian].

Korolchuk, M., Korolchuk, V., Myronets, S., Boltivets, S., Mostova, I., & Koval, V. (2021). Competitive Properties of Trading Companies Managers. Revista Geintec-Gestao Inovacao e Tecnologias, 11(2), 941-954.

Murtazaliev, A. (2012). Theoretical and legal problems of interaction between authorities and civil society institutions in the field of combating corruption. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2. 5-9. [in Russian].

Novella-Garcia, C. & Cloquell-Lozano, A. (2021). The ethics of maxima and minima combined with social justice as a form of public corruption prevention. Crime, Law and Social Change, 75 (3), 281-295.

Rylov, D. (2019). Interaction of civil society and the state in the field of combating corruption. Social integration and development of ethnocultures in the Eurasian space. Thematic area “Civil society against corruption” collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Barnaul, Russia, 334-337. [in Russian].

Sytnyk, H., & Olesenko, I. (2020). Solvency Control of the Enterprise in the Bankruptcy Prevention System. Economics Ecology Socium, 4(2), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.2-2

Tihomirov, Ju. (2013). Participation of Civil Society Institutions in the Fight against Corruption: A Scientific and Practical Guide. Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, LLC “POLYGRAPH-PLUS”, Moscow, Russia. [in Russian].

Wickberg, S. (2020). New public management and the prevention of corruption: Rupture or continuity? Revue Francaise d'Administration Publique, 175(3), 661-676.

Yankovyi, V., Koval, V., Dudka, T. & Bykhovchenko, V. (2021). Statistical assessment of project economic priority in company's investment management. Revista Gestion de las Personas y Tecnologia, 42, 98-119. https://doi.org/10.35588/gpt.v15i42.5284