Preference of fruits in birds that visit a feeder in the city of Caracas.
Abstract
Feeders for birds are increasingly common in cities, although very little is known about their food preferences. The objectives of this study consisted in identifying the preferences of the fruits consumed by birds that frequented an urban feeder; as well as determine the time spent eating and social interactions. The observations were made in a feeder located in a window about 15 meters high, where portions of three species of fruit were placed (banana, papaya and plantain). The following variables were recorded: species of bird, duration of the visit, fruit consumed, number of times the fruit was eaten, whether they came alone or accompanied, interactions, and fruit transportation. Recordings of the feeder were made during three continuous days, from November 11 to 13, 2022, during periods of 12 hours. During the sampling, six species were recorded visiting the feeder (Coereba flaveola, Columbina talpacoti, Melanerpes rubricapillus, Melanospiza bicolor, Pitangus sulphuratus and Thraupis episcopus). A total of 140 visits were recorded. The species that visited the feeder the most was M. bicolor, followed by T. episcopus and P. sulphuratus. The banana was the most consumed fruit, followed by the platain. The morning was the moment of greatest influx of visits. The species that spent the longest time at the feeder were C. flaveola and M. bicolor, while the largest birds, M. rubricapillus, P. sulphuratus and T. episcopus, stayed on shorter visits.
Downloads
References
BAPTISTA, L. F., P. W. TRAIL y h. M. hORBLIT. 1997. Family Columbidae (Pigeons). Pps.60-243 en J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott y J. Sargatal (eds.), Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 4. Sandgrouse to Cuckoos. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, España.
BRADLEy, C. A. y S. ALTIZER. 2007. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 95–102.
BURT, S. A., C. J. VOS, J. A. BUIJS y R. J. CORBEE. 2021. Nutritional implications of feeding free living birds in public urban areas. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 105: 385.
DEKA, P., A. kAShyAP, D. ShARMA y C. BARUAh. 2019. A review on Musa balbisiana Colla. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent.7: 14–17.
FULLER, R. A., P. h. WARREN, P. R. ARMSWORTh, O. BARBOSA y k. J. GASTON. 2008. Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers. Distribut. 14: 131–137.
GALBRAITh, J. A., M. C. STANLEy, D. N. JONES y J. R. BEGGS. 2017. Experimental feeding regime influences urban bird disease dynamics. J. Avian Biol. 48: 700–713.
GhANI, A. 2003. Medicinal Plants of Bangladesh: Chemical Constituents and Uses (2 ed). The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 315.
GOEL, R. k. y k. SAIRAM. 2002. Anti-ulcer Drugs from Indigenous Sources with Emphasis on Musa sapientum, Tamrabhasma, Asparagus racemosus and Zingiber officinale. Indian J. Pharmacol. 34: 100–110.
HILTy, S. 2020. Blue-gray Tanager (Thraupis episcopus), version 1.0 en J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, y E. de Juana (eds), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.bugtan.01
hILTy, S. L. 2003. Birds of Venezuela. Princenton Univ. Press, New Jersey, USA.
hILTy, S. y D. A. ChRISTIE. 2020. Bananaquit (Coereba flaveola), version 1.0. en J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, y E. de Juana (eds).Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA.
hOLWAy, D. A. 1999. Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251. doi: 10.1890/ 0012-9658(1999)080[0238:CMUTDO2.0.CO;2]
IShIGAME G, G. S. BAxTER y A. T. LISLE. 2006. Effects of artificial foods on the blood chemistry of the Australian magpie. Austral Ecol. 31: 199–207.
IMAM, M. Z. y S. AkTER. 2011. Musa paradisiaca L. and Musa sapientum L.: A phytochemical and pharmacological review. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 1: 14–20.
JONES, D. 2011. An appetite for connection: Why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu. 111(2): i–vii.
kALITA, h., D. C. BORUAh, M. DEORI, A. hAZARIkA, R. SARMA, S. kUMARI, R. kANDIMALLA, J. kOTOky y R. DEVI. 2016. Antidiabetic and Antilipidemic Effect of Musa balbisiana Root Extract: A Potent Agent for Glucose Homeostasis in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rat. Front. Pharmacol. 7: 102
kOUL, B., B. PUDhUVAI, C. ShARMA, A. kUMAR, V. ShARMA, D. yADAV y J. O. JIN. 2022. Carica papaya L.: a tropical fruit with benefits beyond the tropics. Diversity. 14: 683.
LEVEy, D. J. 1987. Sugar-tasting ability and fruit selection in tropical fruit-eating birds. TheAuk.104: 173–179.
LEVIN, L., L. FAJARDO y N. CEBALLOS. 2000. Orden de llegada y agresiones en aves urbanas en una fuente de alimento controlada. Ecotrópicos.13: 75–80.
MUDIAR R. h., S. VyAS, A. ThAkUR, k. BhANUShALI, R. MIShRA, V. S. ChAUDhARI, A. BhAGWAT y V. kELkAR. 2014. Comparative analysis of physicochemical parameters and bioaccumulation between Musa species. J. Bio. Env, Sci. 5: 31–34.
PERFUMI M., M. MASSI y G. DE CARO G. 1994. Effects of Banana Feeding on Deoxycorticosterone-Induced Hypertension and Salt Consumption in Rats. Pharm. Biol. 32: 115–125.
RABBANI G. h., T. TEkA, B. ZAMAN, N. MAJID, M. khATUN y G. J. FUChS. 2001. Clinical studies in persistent diarrhea: Dietary management with green banana or pectin in Bangladeshi children. Gastroenterol. 121: 554–560.
RENNER, S. C., S. BAUR, A. POSSLER, J. WINkLER, E. k. kALkO, P. J. BATES y M. A. MELLO. 2012. Food preferences of winter bird communities in different forest types. PLoS One7:e53121.
RESTALL, R. 2003. Breeding the Black-faced Grassquit Tiaris bicolor omissa, with some notes on behaviour. Avic. Magazine. 109: 174–179.
RESTALL, R., C. RODNER y M. LENTINO. 2006. Birds of northern South America, Volume 2: an identification guide. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, USA.
RISING, J. D. 2020. Black-faced Grassquit (Melanospiza bicolor), version 1.0. en J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie y E. de Juana (eds), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.bkfgra.01.
ROBB, G. N., R. A. MCDONALD, D. E. ChAMBERLAIN y S. BEARhOP. 2008. Food for thought: Supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6: 476–484.
SAINZ-BORGO, C. 2016. Estudio del comportamiento de aves que visitan una Fuente artificial de alimento. Bol. Centro Invest. Biol. 50: 100–112.
SAINZ-BORGO, C. y L. LEVIN. 2012. Análisis experimental de la función antidepredadora del agrupamiento en aves que visitan una fuente de alimento. Ecotrópicos. 25:15–21.
SARDINhA-RAVELO, E. y C. SAINZ-BORGO. 2016. Estrategias de forrajeo de diversas especies de la familia Tyrannidae en un ambiente urbano. Ecotropicos. 29: 43–48.
SEIJAS, A. E. 2021. Hierarchies and co-occurrences among bird species visiting a feeder at an urban garden of Venezuela. Anartia. 33: 55–65.
SEIJAS, A. E., y S. F. SEIJAS-FALkENhAGEN. 2020. Birds at a feeder in an urban garden in Venezuela: Abundances, interactions and fruit preferences. Anartia. 31:1–15.
TRyJANOWSkI, P., A. P. MøLLER, F. MORELLI, P. INDykIEWICZ, P. ZDUNIAk y L. MyCZkO. 2018. Food preferences by birds using bird-feeders in winter: a large-scale experiment. Avian Res. 9: 1–6.
VIJAyAkUMAR, S., G. PRESANNAkUMAR y N. R. VIJAyALAkShMI. 2009. Investigations on the Effect of Flavonoids from Banana, Musa paradisiaca L. on Lipid Metabolism in Rats. J. Diet. Suppl. 6: 111–123.
yOGIRAJ, V., P. k. GOyAL y C. S. ChAUhAN. 2015. Carica papaya Linn: an overview. Int. J. Herb. Med. 2: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103 122
WINkLER, h. y D. A. ChRISTIE. 2020. Red-crowned Woodpecker (Melanerpes rubricapillus), version 1.0. en (J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott, J. Sargatal, D. A. Christie, and E. de Juana, Editors), Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.recwoo1.01.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:Â
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).