Assessment of Phenotypic Methods for Metalobetalactamase Detection in Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. Its isolation is common in intensive care unit patients who also usually have multi-resistance. This greatly limits therapeutic options, since no effec tive drugs are available for treatment. The study
aims to evaluate four phenotypic methods for detecting metallo-beta-lactamases. The double disc synergy with EDTA method, combined imipenem and meropenem disk with EDTA method, the E-Test-MBL method and the modified Hodge method, along with a reference method (PCR), are used to determine the phenotypic method or a combination of these is used that is more valid and safe for implementation in routine bacteriology laboratories. The sensitivity and specificity of the phenotypic methods used was good (over 90%); the modified Hodge test obtained the best results in detecting MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates (lower rate of false positive and negative). On analyzing the different combined methods for determining the association with greater sensitivity and specificity, the double disc method associated with the modified Hodge test met these characteristics. Results suggest that these two methods should be routinely used in a bacteriology laboratory, since they are easy to per form, sensi tive, specific and economical.
Copyright (c) 2013 Armindo José Perozo Mena, Maribel Josefina Castellano González, Kathyuska Tutaya Chávez, Eliana Ling Toledo, Nailet Arraiz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Kasmera journal is registered under a Creative Commons an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en; which guarantees the freedom to share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt-remix, transform and build from the material, provided that the name of the authors, the Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Zulia´s University and Kasmera Journal, you must also provide a link to the original document and indicate if changes have been made.
The Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Zulia and Kasmera Journal do not retain the rights to published manuscript and the contents are the sole responsibility of the authors, who retain their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights. The guarantee on the intervention of the manuscript (revision, correction of style, translation, layout) and its subsequent dissemination is granted through a license of use and not through a transfer of rights, which represents the Kasmera Journal and Department Infectious Diseases, University of Zulia are exempt from any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct by the authors.
Kasmera is considered a green SHERPA/RoMEO journal, that is, it allows self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a manuscript) and the post-print (the corrected and peer-reviewed version) and even the final version (layout as it will be published in the journal) both in personal repositories and in institutional and databases.