Estudio comparativo de tres técnicas coproparasitológicas empleadas en el diagnóstico de la giardiasis e hymenolepiasis

  • Glenis Chourio de Lozano Universidad del Zulia-Venezuela

Abstract

Con el fin de seleccionar, el mejor método coproparasitológico en el diagnóstico de Giardiasis e Hymenolepiasis, se examinaron 300 muestras fecales en pacientes de Pediatría del Hospital Universitario por los métodos directo, Faust y Ritchie. Los resultados finales permiten concluir la superioridad de Ritchie en el diagnóstico de Giardiasis, mientras que para Hymenolepiasis los tres métodos en estudio resultaron igualmente útiles y eficaces. Es necesario destacar la distorsión de los elementos parasitarios al emplear la técnica de Faust, lo cual no ocurrió con otros métodos empleados en el presente estudio.

Published
1982-09-21
How to Cite
1.
Chourio de Lozano G. Estudio comparativo de tres técnicas coproparasitológicas empleadas en el diagnóstico de la giardiasis e hymenolepiasis. Kasmera [Internet]. 1982Sep.21 [cited 2024May12];10(1-4):134-46. Available from: https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/kasmera/article/view/4460
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 1-4 (1982)
Section
Original Articles

Copyright (c) 2012 Glenis Chourio de Lozano

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Kasmera journal is registered under a Creative Commons an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en; which guarantees the freedom to share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt-remix, transform and build from the material, provided that the name of the authors, the Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Zulia´s University and Kasmera Journal, you must also provide a link to the original document and indicate if changes have been made.

The Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Zulia and Kasmera Journal do not retain the rights to published manuscript and the contents are the sole responsibility of the authors, who retain their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights. The guarantee on the intervention of the manuscript (revision, correction of style, translation, layout) and its subsequent dissemination is granted through a license of use and not through a transfer of rights, which represents the Kasmera Journal and Department Infectious Diseases, University of Zulia are exempt from any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct by the authors.

Kasmera is considered a green SHERPA/RoMEO journal, that is, it allows self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a manuscript) and the post-print (the corrected and peer-reviewed version) and even the final version (layout as it will be published in the journal) both in personal repositories and in institutional and databases.