Estudio comparativo de dos métodos para valoración cuantitativa de la parasitemia por tripanosomas

  • Ricardo Soto Urribarrí Universidad del Zulia-Venezuela

Abstract

El autor efectúa una comparación entre las técnicas de Pizzi y la de Petana con modificaciones por él propuestas, para valoración cuantitativa de la parasitemia por tripanosomas, realiza 90 determinaciones simultáneas con ambas técnicas y somete o pruebas de significancia estadística las muestras. Los resultados obtenidos indican que las variaciones entre ambas pruebas no tienen significancia estadística y las observadas son debidas al azar. Concluye considerando que en los casos de parasitemia baja es recomendable la técnica de Pizzi modificaciones y en parasitemias elevadas recomienda la técnica de Petana con las modificaciones por él propuestas

Published
1974-09-21
How to Cite
1.
Soto Urribarrí R. Estudio comparativo de dos métodos para valoración cuantitativa de la parasitemia por tripanosomas. Kasmera [Internet]. 1974Sep.21 [cited 2024Nov.22];5(1):103-10. Available from: https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/kasmera/article/view/4401
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (1974)
Section
Original Articles

Copyright (c) 2012 Ricardo Soto Urribarrí

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Kasmera journal is registered under a Creative Commons an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en; which guarantees the freedom to share-copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt-remix, transform and build from the material, provided that the name of the authors, the Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Zulia´s University and Kasmera Journal, you must also provide a link to the original document and indicate if changes have been made.

The Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Zulia and Kasmera Journal do not retain the rights to published manuscript and the contents are the sole responsibility of the authors, who retain their moral, intellectual, privacy and publicity rights. The guarantee on the intervention of the manuscript (revision, correction of style, translation, layout) and its subsequent dissemination is granted through a license of use and not through a transfer of rights, which represents the Kasmera Journal and Department Infectious Diseases, University of Zulia are exempt from any liability that may arise from ethical misconduct by the authors.

Kasmera is considered a green SHERPA/RoMEO journal, that is, it allows self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a manuscript) and the post-print (the corrected and peer-reviewed version) and even the final version (layout as it will be published in the journal) both in personal repositories and in institutional and databases.