Corpus-based conceptualization in sociology: possibilities and limits
Resumen
The problem of the quantitative interpretation of qualitative data is one of the most important in sociological research. Textual analysis has placed emphasis on deep and careful study of texts how personal strategies embodied in the concepts. However, quantitative interpretation has always been problematic. Our paper deals with the corpus-based conceptualization method, which can be considered as a method of collecting and organizing data material from linguistic corpora. The corpusbased conceptualization allows us to establish a closer link with the meaning and identify the whole spectrum of meanings. It shows that some sociologists lose essential meanings in the research process because of lack of in-deep immersion in the daily life and speech of the people. We chose the concepts of "altruism" and "mercy" as examples to demonstrate the corpusbased conceptualization and its place in sociological research methodology. Data comes from the Russian National Corpus. The Russian National Corpus consists of 1802 relevant words, with 775 for altruism and 1047 for mercy. Data processing carried out by SPSS 19.0. As the result, we have discussed what difficulties the researcher can meet using this method and have offered Systemic Functional Grammar (SFL) and Role and Reference grammar as a way to accurately determining the context. Our suggestions can be used in the preparation of questionnaires, guides, in an analysis of interview transcripts.Descargas
Citas
Abulof, U. (2015). Normative concepts analysis: Unpacking the language of legitimation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 73-89. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.861656
Aijmer, Karin & Bengt Altenberg (eds.) (1991) English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman
Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings (2008) Т. 31. Р.
–297. http://www.corpus-linguistics.com
Gladkova, A., & Romero-Trillo, J. (2014). Ain’t it beautiful? The conceptualization of beauty from an ethnopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 140-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma. 2013.11.005
Halliday, M.A.K. (1975). Sociological aspects of semantic change. In Luigi Heilman (ed), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Mulino.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) Introduction to Functional Grammar, London:
Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1991). "Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar". In English Corpus Linguistics ed by K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg, 30-43. London: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1992). "Language as system and language as instance: the corpus as a theoretical construct". Mouton de Gruyter, Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, ed. Jan Svartvik (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 65).
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1962). American Sociological Review, 27(6), 757-767. http://
dx.doi.org/10.2307/2090403
McEnery T., Hardie A. (2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McEnery T., Wilson A. (2001) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Pavenkov, O., Pavenkov, V. & Rubtcova, M. (2015). The altruistic behavior: characteristic of future teachers of inclusive education in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. International Conference Psiworld 2014 - 5th Edition. Volume: 187 Pages: 10-15.
Pavenkov O., Rubtcova M. Love as a concept in the religious philosophy of Pavel Florensky. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia. 2016. V. 33. Issue 1. P. 163-180.
Pavenkov Oleg, Shmelev Ilya & Rubtcova Mariia (2016). Coping Behavior Of Orthodox Religious Students In Russia. Journal for the study of religions and ideologies. 15(44), 205-224.
Pavenkov, O. & Pavenkova, M. (2016). Discourse analysis based on Martin and Rose's taxonomy: a case of promoting student discourse on the CLIL PhD programme in religion philosophy. Revista Electrónica Espacio Teológico. 10: 17 Pages: 129-139
Rubtcova, M. P.& Pavenkov, O. V. (2016). Interaction of Russian and English academic genres in CLIL doctoral programmes of Management Sociology: a gap in the process of implementation. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. 3: 2.
Rubtcova, M. & Vasilieva, E. (2015). Managing Human Capital: How Public Servants Support the Governance's Performance Conception in Russia. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Public Administration, 237-247.
Rubtcova M., Pavenkov O. & Varlamova J. (2017) Multisemiotic Analysis of Orthodox Patriarchs’ Photographs: Cross-Cultural (Indian and Russian) Differences in Interpretation of Interactive Meanings. In: Linguistics: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Ed. Harry Barnes. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York
Rubtcova, M. & Pavenkov, O. (2016). Systemic Functional Linguistics as a Macro- sociolinguistics Framework: The Stages of Development. Studies in Linguistics. 38: 471-492.
Rubtsova, M. V. & Vasilieva, E. A. (2016). Conceptualization and operationalization of notion «trust» for applied sociological research. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. Issue: 1 Pages: 58-65.
Russian National Corpus. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.ruscorpora.ru/ Rubtsova, M. V. 2007. Manageability: sociological theoretical analysis of notions.
Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya (12), 32-38.
Rubtsova, M. V. 2011. Governmentability In interactions of subjects. Traditional and
new practices. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya (2), 46-53.
Volchkova, L.T. and Pavenkova, M.V., 2002 Sociology of management. Theoretical
principles. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. Issue: 3:141-144
Van Valin, R.D. Jr. & R. J. LaPolla, 1997. Syntax, Structure, Meaning and Function.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Usiaeva, A., Rubtcova, M., Pavlenkova, I.; et al. (2016). Sociological Diagnostics in Staff Competency Assessments: Evidence from Russian Museums. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 4: 1 Pages: 29-33.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de CreativeCommons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea TheEffect of Open Access).