semiotic code in Ancient Rus can be taken as an example. The groups of skomorokhs were
also distinguished by specific clothes, masks, musical instruments, etc. However, although
having such bright image, the episodicity of performance production by these groups
problematized the issue of skomorokhs’ community as a professional one. They are more
likely traced back to pagan myth-ritual practices, for which the performance was rather a
form than content (Zhuravlev, Nestik, 2011).
Actors’ communities can be also typologized, singling out the professional one
consisting of actors with professional education. It can be spatially represented by actors of
provincial or metropolitan theaters; the subprofessional community, which comprised
amateur actors without professional education and related to professional community
episodically and partially. The members of that community were rather often localized by
the stage in houses of culture, unspecialized premises (basements, attics, art cafes), street
spaces; near-theater community consisting of people close to artistic environment and
involved into different artistic projects from time to time, though not losing the contact
with the artistic environment.
The presented typologies of the actor’s emotional nature are grouped around the
performance specific “energy center” (and here the analogies with energy understanding in
S. Freud’s psychoanalysis, B. Massumi’s vital energy and А. Badiou’s transforming effect of
Event are appropriate). Performance, in its realization, sets specific spatial-time
boundaries-discontinuities, which deliberately take the subject out of the sphere of trivial
and secular, and “suspend” habitual practices (B. Massumi) in the excess of acting, life
principle that is realized “here and now”, at the moment, during the performance. The
Event, as the power or energy of sense, as well as Acting, last outside it. Here, we take the
liberty to designate it with the capital letter, since it produces performance as a profession
and sets it as a goal in itself, creating both a separate person (and transforming it) and the
whole community, which we call the artistic subculture and define it as the community of
people with the main and single goal to produce performance (Lipovetsky, Beumers, 2012).
Professional mythologems do not only mark the actors’ community but also preserve
it, mark its boundaries. Moreover, the latter are necessary to preserve the community. The
phenomenon of “personal” mythologems – superstitions and beliefs – speaks of the
appropriation of the whole actors’ mythology by a certain subject, subjectivization of
collective performances, thus verifying their “live” character. If the assertion that the myth