'%3E%0A%3Cpath d='M0 98.6H935v-26H0v26Z' class='g0'/%3E%0A%3C/g%3E%0A%3Cpath d='M0 1169.7H935v-26H0v26Z' class='g0'/%3E%0A%3Cpath clip-path='url(%23c0)' d='M935 1169.7h935v-26H935v26Z' class='g0'/%3E%0A%3Cpath d='M117.3 232.3h16m63.2 49.5H213m179.9 330h7.9m6.5 0h15.9m-189.3 33h16M378.3 793.3H386m-21.2 66h16.4m-248.8 66H148m5.8 0h15.7m5.8 0h15.6M699.2 149.8h16.5m7 0h16.5m7 0h16.5m-94.5 33h16.5M871.3 430.3h8M489.2 446.8h16.2m6.5 0h16.2m6.6 0h16.2m6.5 0h16.2m289 264h16.1m-46.7 66h18.3' class='g1'/%3E%0A%3C/svg%3E)
The effects of plastic bags on the health in cattle / Rouabah et al._______________________________________________________________
4 of 5
stray cattle in India suffer from various affections due to foreign
materials in their reticulum–rumen, 90% of which are plastic
bags. He attributed this to the materials used for waste storage,
shopping bags and food items that are ingested by free–grazing
animals, especially in cities and towns.
Bakhiet [12], also noted that plastic bags are the most frequently
encountered foreign bodies in ruminants in Sudan, and cleaning
the environment would significantly reduce foreign body syndrome.
Tiruneh and Yesuwork [14] also came to the same conclusion.
Multiple and varied macroscopic lesions, including congestion,
hemorrhage, stunting, sagging, atrophy, and a reduction in papillary
thickness, were observed. Moreover, ulceration and erosion were
noted in the rumen–reticulum of all cattle that had ingested a
considerable amount of plastic bags, as shown in (FIG. 2). Nodular
lesions and scars were also present. The forestomach wall was
thinner than normal and had a light, mottled appearance and
compressed papillae (FIG. 3). These lesions can be attributed
to the persistent irritation of the rumen–reticulum wall, which
results from the pressure applied by the continuous movement of
the plastic bags, a consequence of their substantial volume and
weight. They would most often cause compressive, obstructive
or downright abrasive actions.
This process leads to the erosion of papillae and the rumen mucosa,
particularly at the rumen pillars, accompanied by hyperplastic
alterations in the epithelial mucosa and the presence of inflammation.
It is also possible that some lesions could result from chronic frictional
micro–trauma caused by the plastic bags, as reported by [7, 14].
Abdelaal and El–Maghawry [15], reported that the accumulation
of plastic bags and other indigestible materials weighing 1.5 to 4.5
kg, mixed with rumen contents, resulted in partial occlusion of the
rumen. Macroscopic examination showed that the physical effect
of a relatively large weight of foreign bodies led to the stripping
and stunting of the ruminal papillae.
The intensity of macroscopic changes was found to be proportional
to the quantity of plastic substances detected in the rumens, which
varied from a few small pieces (g) to 10 kg (FIG. 1). Singh [2], reported
that animals suffering from ruminal impaction due to plastic bags
exhibited pathological conditions such as impaction, indigestion,
tympany, chemical leaching, traumatic reticulopericarditis,
polybezoars, and immunosuppression. Kahn et al. [13] indicated
that in some instances, the plastic materials were particularly stiff.
Tiruneh and Yesuwork, Abdelaal and EL–Maghawry, and Calfee
and Manning [14, 15, 16] suggest that the severity of the pathological
changes is influenced by the characteristics of the foreign body,
the duration it remains in the rumen, and the extent of obstruction
it creates.
The microscopic examination of samples taken from the
forestomachs containing plastic bags (FIG. 4) showed a wide
variety of lesions. Lesions of fragmentary or segmental ruptures,
destruction, necrosis, degeneration and focal hyperplasia (or even
metaplasia) of the keratinized epithelium were observed. The
papillae are shortened, atrophied, folded and compressed. The
length of the papillae was reduced. The histopathological changes
observed can be explained by the mechanical irritation produced
by plastic bags, along with the chemical compounds released from
these non–biodegradable bodies [12, 17, 18].
According to Otsyina et al. [18], the ruminal mucosa of animals
free from plastic foreign bodies exhibited fully developed and
well–structured papillae of varying lengths; long, intermediate,
and short. The stratified epithelial layer of the papillae appeared
thin, continuous, and without any structural disruptions.
The mucosal surface was smooth and intact, showing no
projections into the submucosa. The submucosal layer contained
dense connective tissue with only a few lymphatic channels, while
both the muscular and serosal layers appeared normal, showing
no pathological alterations.
On the other hand,some authors have found that microscopic
examination of the plastic–overloaded rumen revealed extensive
or superficial coagulative necrotic lesions affecting the mucosa
and submucosa, sometimes erosive and occasionally ulcerative [5,
11, 19, 20, 21]. Marked and inflammatory hyperemia with cellular
infiltration mainly of neutrophilic granulocytes in the mucosa and
sometimes extending into the submucosa. The presence of focal
epithelial hyperplasia was significant, affecting the mucosal surfaces
in multiple areas. This condition was characterized by finger–like
projections of varying lengths that extended into the lamina propria
and the submucosa beneath, with some reaching the muscularis.
Furthermore, several mitotic figures and cells with more than
one nucleolus were observed in the hyperplastic regions. Most of
the lesions observed in the present study are very close to those
described by these different authors.
Histological sections of the liver of cattle with a foreign body
in the forestomachs show a normal architecture of the hepatic
parenchyma and do not reveal any microscopic lesions as shown
in FIG. 5. Contrary to these results, Abu–Seida and Al–Abbadi [22]
reported the presence of a necrotic center infiltrated by plasma
cells, as well as the presence of macrophages and epithelioid cells.
Moreover, according to Costa de Sousa et al. [ 23] the
histopathological evaluation of the liver showed that 85% of the
hepatic parenchyma was impacted. The lesions were defined by
a diffuse inflammatory response affecting the hepatocytes, with
the presence of some discrete and clear vacuoles on the sides of
the nucleus (lipid degeneration).
These modifications arise from the partial blockage of the reticulo–
omasal orifice, which is due to the presence of a considerable
quantity of foreign objects in the rumen. This condition restricts
the flow of rumen contents through the reticulo–omasal orifice
and diminishes the absorption of nutrients that are advantageous
to the animal. As a result, this restriction causes a substantial
mobilization of adipose tissue and, in turn, leads to an accumulation
of triglycerides in the liver.
CONCLUSION
From the present study, it is concluded that the extent of
overloading cattle stomachs with foreign bodies (plastic bags)
is quite significant. Histological examination of the rumen wall
showed several distinct tissue changes caused by mechanical