
Leptospira species in cattle from slaughterhouses in Mexico / Ochoa-Valencia et al. _______________________________________________
4 of 9
Sample processing
The biological samples were transported to the laboratory of Infectious
Diseases in the Diagnostic Unit of the Ranch “Torreón del Molino” of
the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics of the Universidad
Veracruzana. The tubes with blood were centrifuged in a centrifuge
(Hsiang Tai Model CN-3600, Taiwan, China) at 1,000 G for 10 minutes (min)
to separate the serum from the clot. Once the serum was separated, it
was deposited in 500 microliters (µL) polypropylene microtubes that
were kept frozen at –20 °C in a Freezer (Thermo Scientic, 05LFEETSA,
Massachusetts, United States –USA-) until later use.
Antibodies detection
The detection of anti-Leptospira antibodies was carried out using
the microscopic agglutination technique (MAT) [38]. The analysed sera
were prepared individually, 100 µL of each sample was deposited in
polyethylene tubes with 2,400 µL of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)
to obtain an initial dilution of 1:25, and they were kept refrigerated at
4 °C until later use (LG, LT57BPSX, Busan, South Korea). The MAT was
performed by placing 50 µL of PBS in each of the wells of a 96-well
ELISA plate, adding 50 µL of the initial dilution (1:25); subsequently,
50 µL of the serovar to be evaluated was added to each well. This was
repeated in total with 10 different serovars, which belong to three
different Leptospira species.
The reaction was evaluated using dark eld microscopy (Carl Zeiss,
Axio Lab A1, Jena, Germany). Samples that did not react with 50, 75
or 100% agglutination were discarded. All the samples (n=54) that
presented the aforementioned reaction were titrated until they did
not present a minimum agglutination of 50% of Leptospira, and in this
way, the degree of exposure to the different serovars and species of
Leptospira was assessed, considering as seroreactors all those sera
that reacted to titers ≥ 1:100 [8].
Leptospira genome detection and analysis
Total Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction was carried out using
Chelex-100 chelating resin (Bio-Rad®, United States of America (USA))
[37]. The extractions were carried out individually using 3-5 grams (g) of
the central part (kidney lobe) of the kidney samples preserved in ethanol,
which were macerated and placed in polypropylene microtubes. A
total of 500 µL of a 10% Chelex-100 solution and 20 µL of proteinase
K (SIGMA life sciences®, USA) were added to each tube. The samples
were incubated for 24 hours (h) at 56 °C (IVYX Scientic, 0745556232573,
Washington, USA). Subsequently, they were centrifuged at 25,000 G
for 15 min, and the supernatant was collected and deposited in new
polypropylene microtubes that were stored at –20 °C for later use.
For the detection of pathogenic Leptospira DNA, it was
performed a conventional polymerase chain reaction probe (PCR)
in a Veriti 96-Well Fast Thermal Cycler (ThermoFisher Scientic,
4375305, Massachusetts,USA) that amplied a fragment of 430
base pairs (bp) of the LipL32 gene, by using the following pair of
primers: Forward 5’-ATCTCCGTTGCACTCTTTGC-3’ and Reverse
5’-ACCATCATCATCATCGTCCA-3 [56]. PCR amplication was performed
using the following thermal conditions: an initial denaturation cycle
at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 seconds
(s), and 72 °C for 1 min, and a nal extension at 72 °C for 7 min [56].
The PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels stained with
uorochrome iQ ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad®, USA), using 1X TAE
(40 miliMol (mM) Tris-acetate, pH 8.0, 1 mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA)) as a running buffer and a 100 bp Phi X174 DNA molecular
weight marker, for 45 min at 85 volts (V). Subsequently, the gels were
visualized with the aid of the Odyssey CLx Imaging System (LICOR
Biosciences®) [56].
The positive PCR products were puried using the QIAquick kit
(Quiagen®, Hilden, Germany) and sent for sequencing by the Sanger
method (Life Technology® 3500 xl) to Macrogen, Korea. The recovered
sequences were visualized using BioEdit, and once curated, local
alignments were performed using the BLAST-n tool available from
GenBank® (on the NCBI platform). Additionally, reference sequences
of validated Leptospira species deposited in GenBank® were obtained
and aligned with those recovered in the present study, and a
phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the maximum
likelihood method with the general time reversible substitution model
under 10,000 bootstrap iterations in Mega v.10.
The results were analysed with descriptive epidemiology. Likewise,
the differences between the MS: one (n=30), two (n=30) and three
(n=20), were evaluated calculating the 95% condence intervals (CIs);
the general frequency (of anti-Leptospira antibodies) and specicity
(by serovar) were determined with the statistical program STATA V.14.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Serological assays identied anti-Leptospira antibody titres (from
positive animals) that ranged from 1:100 to 1:3,200, obtaining a general
antibody frequency of 67.5% (54/80; 95% CI 56.1-77.5). The higher
frequency of seroreacting animals was 71.8%, obtained in the rst
slaughterhouse (23/30; 95% CI 53.2-86.2) (TABLE II). The species with
the highest frequency of positive hosts were L. interrogans serovar
Hardjo with 18.7% (15/80; 95% CI 10.9-29.0), followed by L. borgpetersenii
serovar Mini with 25.0% (20/80; 95% CI 15.9-35.9), and L. santarosai
serovar Tarassovi with 37.5% (30/80; 95% CI 26.9-49.0) (TABLES II AND III).
TABLE II
Frequency of anti-Leptospira antibodies by slaughterhouse
Slaughterhouse n Positive F% (
CI
95%
)
1 30 23 71.8 (53.2-86.2)
2 30 15 50.0 (31.2-68.7)
3 20 16 84.2 (60.4-96.6)
Total 80 54 67.5 (56.1-77.5)
F: frequency, Condence Interval at 95%: (CI
95%
)
From the collected kidneys (n=55), 30 of them corresponded to the
rst MS, ve of them to the second MS, and 20 of them to the third
MS, from which six samples amplied positive for the 430 bp of the
LipL32 fragment, which represent a frequency of 10.9% (6/55; 95%
CI 4.1-22.2). The six PCR positive products were sequenced, and ve
full sequences were retrieved for the phylogenetic reconstruction.
Sequences were deposited in GenBank under the following Accession
numbers: OP273650 – OP273655. The ve sequences exhibited a 99%
(429/430 bp) similarity with sequences of L. interrogans deposited in
GenBank. Additionally, the phylogenetic reconstruction grouped our
sequences with those of the L. interrogans group in a monophyletic
subgroup with a support value of 98% (FIG. 1).