This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Loyola et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024 41(2): e244118
5-6 |
Colour presented variations in color at day 60 of the study,
ranging from 2.95 to 7.69. The panelists perceived that the pepper
soup exhibited a “light red“ related with the state of maturity of the
fruits (Cordero-Bueso, 2013). According to Arslan and Ozcan (2011)
the loss of coloration in red peppers is mainly due to the oxidation
of the carotenoids present in the fruit. In peppers, the most relevant
carotenoids are capsanthin and capsorubin (Gómez García and Ochoa
Alejo, 2013).
Aroma
Aranceta Bartrina et al. (2006) said the characteristic smell of
fruits and vegetables is due to the volatile substances. There were
not signicant dierences in relation to aroma at day 60, being the
identied weighting range between indistinctly 2.54 to 5.87 which
was close to “tasteless”. According to the panelists, soups elaborated
with treatment (T
2
) was the best one in relation to the aroma
attribute of the assessed soups. In general, the panelists perceived a
tasteless aroma in pepper soups, of the applied treatment used for
the elaboration of soups. Aroma, in all the treatments, was assessed
with the highest weighting at day 30 and the soups elaborated with
treatment T
0
were the ones obtaining the highest weighting (5.87), the
soups elaborated with treatment T
1
got (5.77). The soups elaborated
at day 60 with treatments T
0
and T
1
showed little dierence between
them (3.51 to 3.46), although, those soups elaborated with treatment
T
2
were assessed in a better way than those of the other two treatments
(3.91). Pepper is highly demanded by the food industry because of
its aromatic properties, colorants, and avorings (Arslan and Özcan,
2011).
Appearance
The soups elaborated with the three treatments and that were
assessed at day 60 did not show signicant dierences between them,
according to the panelists´opinion. In the rst sensorial analysis (day
0), the soups elaborated with treatments T
1
and T
2
were assessed
with the highest weighting (6.41), like, “I slightly like it”, being this,
the highest assessment in the three sensorial analyses performed.
The soup elaborated with treatment T
0
at day 60, which managed
to impose it in relation to the other treatments (6.13), the panelists
assessed this treatment as “I slightly like it”. In the three assessments
performed, the panelists found an acceptable appearance.
The acceptability of the elaborated soups that used the dierent
treatments did not show signicant dierences during 60 days the
storage time of the pulp (value-p 0.983).
The soups elaborated at time 0 with treatment T
2
obtained a higher
weighting (6.38) as “I slightly like it” (values are not shown). The
soups elaborated with the treatments T
0
and T
1
at day 30 showed the
same acceptability “I slightly like it”. The acceptability of the soups
at day 60 elaborated with treatments T
1
and T
2
was “I neither like it
nor I dislike it”.
Total Coliform Count
The group of total coliform comprises the gender of the family
Enterobacteriaceae, such as: Eschiria, Citrobacter, Klebsiella,
Enterobacter (Forbes, 2009). The soups elaborated with the totality
of the treatments assessed obtained minor values at 3.0 NMP.g
-1
(more probable.gram number), this showed that the analysed samples
were safe (table 1). The maximum limit per gram of Echerichia coli
in soups and broths can not be more than 10 in 2 g (Ministerio de
Salud de Chile, 2021).
The total coliform count showed that pepper pulps were safe
in the three treatments, this would show that scalding and freezing
would guarantee the safety of the pulps during the sixty days of
storage.
Conclusions
The treatment two (pulp + stabilizer and sweetener) presented the
best chemical and nutritional results to elaborate pepper soup; as well
as the better sensory attributes by the panelists perception. So, this is
recommended treatment to elaborate pepper soups.
According to the total coliform count, the safety of the soups
etaborated was guaranteed during the sixty days of storage.
Literature cited
Aguilar Morales, J. (2012). Métodos de conservación de alimentos.
https://www.academia.edu/40500611/M%C3%89TODOS_DE_
CONSERVACI%C3%93N_DE_ALIMENTOS
Aranceta Bartrina, J., Pérez Rodrigo, C., Serra Majem, L., & Ortega Anta, R.
(2006). Frutas, Verduras y Salud. Editorial Elsevier Masson. Barcelona,
España. 268 pp
Arslan, D., & Ozcan Mehmet, M. (2011). Dehydration of red bell-pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.): Change in drying behavior, colour and
antioxidant content. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 89(4), 504–513.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.09.009
Cordero-Bueso, G. (2013). Aplicación del análisis sensorial de los alimentos en la
cocina y en la industria alimentaria. Sevilla, España. Universidad Pablo
de Olavide. pp. 19 – 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3548.4003
Dominguez, R., Quintero Ramos, A., Bourne, M., Barnard, J., Talamás Abbud, R.,
Jiménez Castro, J., & Anzaldúa Morales, A. (2001). Texture of rehydrated
dried bell peppers modied by low-temperature blanching and calcium
addition. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 36(5),
523–527.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2001.00493.x
Eggink, P.M., Maliepaard, C., Tikunov, Y., Haanstra, J.P.W., Bovy, A.G., & Visser,
R.G. (2012). A taste of sweet pepper: Volatile and non-volatile chemical
composition of fresh sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) in relation to
sensory evaluation of taste. Food Chemistry, 132(1), 301–310. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.08 1
Fernández de Rank, E., Monserrat, S., & Sluka, E. (2005). Tecnologías de
conservación por métodos combinados en pimiento, chaucha y berenjena.
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias 37(2), 73 – 81. https://
bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/785
Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Bacteriological Analytical Manual
Chapter 4, Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria.
https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-4-
enumeration-escherichia-coli-and-coliform-bacteria
Forbes, B. (2009). Diagnostico Microbiológico. Editorial Médica Panamericana S.A.
Giambanco, H. (1996). Recolección y manipulación del pimiento. en Namesney, A
(Editor). Pimientos, Compendios de Horticultura. 9a Edición. Barcelona,
España. Ediciones de Horticultura S.L. 129 pp
Gómez García, M., & Ochoa Alejo, N. (2013). Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Chili Peppers (Capsicum spp.).
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14 (9), 19025–19053.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140919025
Table 1. Maximum limit of pathogenic microorganisms is soups for human consumption.
Sampling plan Limit per gram
Parameter Category Class n C M M
Eschiria coli
4 3 5 3 10 10
2
Staphylococcus aureus
7 3 5 2 10 10
2
Salmonella in 25 g
10 2 5 0 0 -----
Source: Ministerio de Salud de Chile, 2021.