© The Authors, 2023, Published by the Universidad del Zulia
*Corresponding author: gustavo.jaimes2@unipamplona.edu.co
Gustavo Adolfo Jaimes Flórez
1*
Dixon Fabián Flórez Delgado
2
César Villamizar Quiñonez
3
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023, 40(1): e234002
ISSN 2477-9407
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47280/RevFacAgron(LUZ).v40.n1.02
Socioeconomics
Associate editor: Dra. Fatima Urdaneta
University of Zulia, Faculty of Agronomy
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Keywords:
Characterization
Indicators
Sheep farming
Critical point
Sustainability evaluation of sheep production in the páramo ecosystem of Cerrito
Santander municipality, Colombia
Evaluación de la sostenibilidad de la producción ovina en el ecosistema de páramo del municipio
Cerrito Santander, Colombia
Avaliação da sustentabilidade da produção ovina no ecossistema páramo no município de Cerrito
Santander, Colombia
1
Zootecnista, Especialista en Planeación para la Educación
Ambiental, Maestría en Extensión y Desarrollo Rural.
Docente Departamento de Zootecnia. Grupo de investigación
GIAS. Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona, Colombia.
2
Zootecnista, Magister en Sistemas sostenibles de
producción, Docente Departamento de Zootecnia. Grupo de
Investigación GIAS. Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona,
Colombia.
3
Ingeniero Agrónomo, Magister en Ciencias agropecuarias,
Grupo de investigación GIAS. Profesor Asociado
Universidad de Pamplona, Pamplona, Colombia.
Received: 24-06-2022
Accepted:
22-11-2022
Published: 19-12-2022
Abstract
The preservation of natural resources and the production of enough
food to meet the demands of a growing human population will be one of
the most important challenges that the world will have to face in the coming
years, hence the need to promote the sustainable use of the resources. The
objective of this research was to evaluate the sustainability of the sheep
production system in the páramo ecosystem, municipality of Cerrito-
Santander, Colombia. A survey was applied to 15 sheep farmers, allowing
the characterization of the production system and the georeferencing of
farms. This information was analyzed by applying descriptive statistics,
using SPSS software, version 24, this allowed to present the most relevant
aspects of sheep production in the sector. Participatory workshops were held
with the producers, to select and evaluate the sustainability indicators of
sheep production systems in the páramo area, which were visualized by a
biogram or spider web graph. Finally, strategic guidelines were formulated
to respond to the critical points of sheep production. Most producers prefer
the commercialization of wool and the use of the animal’s discarded stages
to obtain economic income from the sale of meat. Critical points (food
supplements, type of state support received, use of veterinary services and
use of energy sources) and favorable points (cost of raw materials, food
security and water sources) were evidenced for the economic, social and
environmental dimensions. It is necessary to focus attention on the critical
points and apply the strategic guidelines, since together with the favorable
points they will allow generation and establishment of more sustainable
sheep production systems.
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023, 40(1): e234002. Enero-Marzo. ISSN 2477-9407.
2-7 |
Resumen
La preservación de los recursos naturales y la producción de
alimentos sucientes para satisfacer las demandas de una población
humana en crecimiento será uno de los retos más importantes que
el mundo tendrá que enfrentar en los próximos años, de allí la
necesidad de fomentar el uso sostenible de los recursos. El objetivo
de este trabajo fue evaluar la sostenibilidad del sistema ovino en el
ecosistema de páramo, municipio de Cerrito-Santander, Colombia.
Se aplicó un cuestionario a 15 ovinocultores, permitiendo realizar
la caracterización del sistema de producción y la georreferenciación
de los predios. Esta información se analizó aplicando estadística
descriptiva mediante el software SPSS, versión 24. Se efectuaron
talleres participativos con los productores, para seleccionar y
evaluar los indicadores de sostenibilidad de los sistemas productivos
ovinos en zona de páramo, los cuales fueron visualizados por medio
de un biograma o gráco de telaraña. Finalmente se formularon
lineamientos estratégicos para responder a los puntos críticos de
la producción ovina. La mayoría de los productores le apuesta a la
comercialización de lana y a aprovechar las etapas de descarte del
animal para obtener ingresos económicos por la venta de carne. Se
evidenciaron puntos críticos (suplementos alimenticios, tipo de apoyo
estatal recibido, uso de servicios veterinarios y uso de fuentes de
energía) y favorables (costo materias primas, seguridad alimentaria
y fuentes de agua). Es necesario centrar la atención sobre los puntos
críticos y aplicar los lineamientos estratégicos, ya que junto con los
puntos favorables permitirá generar y establecer sistemas productivos
ovinos más sostenibles.
Palabras clave: caracterización, indicadores, ovinocultura, nudos
críticos.
Resumo
A preservação dos recursos naturais e a produção de alimentos
sucientes para atender as demandas de uma população humana
crescente será um dos desaos mais importantes que o mundo terá
que enfrentar nos próximos anos, daí a necessidade de promover o
uso sustentável dos recursos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a
sustentabilidade do sistema ovino no ecossistema páramo, município
de Cerrito-Santander, Colômbia. Foi aplicado um inquérito a 15
criadores de ovinos, permitindo a caracterização do sistema de
produção e o georreferenciamento das explorações. Essas informações
foram analisadas por meio da aplicação de estatística descritiva,
apresentando os aspectos mais relevantes da produção de ovinos
no setor, utilizando o software SPSS, versão 24. Foram realizadas
ocinas participativas com os produtores, para selecionar e avaliar os
indicadores de sustentabilidade dos sistemas de produção de ovinos
na área do páramo, que foram visualizados por meio de um biograma
ou gráco de teia de aranha. Por m, foram formuladas diretrizes
estratégicas para responder aos pontos críticos da produção ovina. A
maioria dos produtores aposta na comercialização da lã e aproveita
as etapas de descarte do animal para obter uma renda econômica com
a venda da carne. Pontos críticos (suplementos alimentares, tipo de
apoio estatal recebido, uso de serviços veterinários e uso de fontes
de energia) e pontos favoráveis (custo de matérias-primas, segurança
alimentar e fontes hídricas) foram evidenciados para a dimensão
econômica, social e ambiental. É necessário focar a atenção nos
pontos críticos e aplicar as diretrizes estratégicas, pois juntamente
com os pontos favoráveis permitirá a geração e implantação de
sistemas de produção ovina mais sustentáveis.
Palabras-chave: caracterização, indicadores, ovinocultura, ponto
crítico.
Introduction
One of the most important challenges that the world will have
to face in the coming years is related to the preservation of natural
resources and the production of enough food to meet the demands
of a growing human population (Contreras, 2021). The United
Nations Organization (UN, 2018), states that by 2030, sustainable
consumption and production consist of promoting the ecient use
of resources, energy and the construction of environmental friendly
infrastructure.
For a long time, some countries have developed environmental,
economic and social indicators, since they have served as the basis for
future research, where it is intended to achieve that balance between
each and every one of the factors that inuence sustainability, creating
a synergistic and binding environment for all sectors (Quiroga, 2001).
Sustainable agriculture refers to the need to minimize the degradation
of agricultural land, while maximizing production. Thus, dierent
activities are considered, such as soil, water and crop management,
biodiversity conservation, food supply and raw materials. (Martínez-
Castillo, 2009).
The management of sheep production systems varies according
to the agricultural region in which they are developed and involves
multiple factors associated with the animal’s management and with
the environment where the activity is carried out. (Dutruel and De
Caro, 2019). Thus, the environmental component is one of the most
important factors, since a balance must be sought between the use
of water, land and waste management, as in the case of greenhouse
gas emissions (caused by these ruminants), in order to contribute to
the sustainability of agricultural production. (Pulido, et al., 2018).
However, it should be noted, that production systems based on grazing
are more sustainable than those based on having large numbers of
animals in stables, because the presence of pastures and in some cases
trees, allows carbon sequestration produced by animals. (Contreras et
al., 2019; Chávez-Espinoza et al., 2022).
In recent years, sheep production conditions have changed
substantially, inuenced by factors such as climate risk, new
approaches to animal health and welfare, the crisis of raw materials
and/or the perception that consumers have of the livestock (Chávez-
Espinoza et al., 2022; Avendaño and Navarro, 2020).
The municipality of Cerrito Santander is not an exempt from
these problems that are generated in livestock production systems in
páramo areas, since sheep production systems are mainly made up of
small and medium-sized producers who have traditionally focused on
extensive management, without grazing control, genetic and sanitary
component, reecting low zootechnical indexes, and generating
environmental problems, mainly due to the ignorance of the impact
that this activity is generating on the agroecosystem. However, from
the municipal government, this productive sector is promoted by
a development plan, with an economic, social and environmental
approach, through the implementation of strategies and programs to
overcome the problems of the rural population, seeking to improve
the working, productive and competitive conditions that will lead to
an environment of growth and well-being (Alcaldía Municipal, 2020).
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
3-7 |
Nevertheless, it is important to carry out more in-depth studies to
identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the sustainability
of each production system (economic, social and environmental), thus
facilitating the adoption of changes or the most appropriate corrective
measures according to the problems detected. Given the foregoing, it
was proposed to evaluate the sheep production system in the Páramo
ecosystem in the municipality of Cerrito, Santander, Colombia; In
order to achieve this objective, it was necessary to 1) Characterize the
sheep production system by applying a holistic approach that seeks
to address the reality of sheep farmers, in the páramo ecosystem of
the Cerrito Santander municipality, from dierent areas (Sarandón,
2021). 2) Evaluate the dimensions and critical points through the
selected sustainability variables and 3) Formulate strategies for
sheep production in the páramo ecosystem of the Cerrito Santander
municipality, Colombia.
Materials and methods
Study population
The research was carried out in the area of the Almorzadero
páramo at the Cerrito municipality, which is located in the eastern
part of Santander department, located to the Northeast of the García
Rovira Province and approximately 22 km from the city of Malaga,
capital of the province; 188 km from Bucaramanga, capital of the
Department, and 390 km from the city of Bogotá, capital of the
country. It is located at an altitude of 2,500 meters above sea level,
at 73° and 0.3 minutes east longitude, 6° and 0.1 minutes north
longitude.
A satellite image was developed with the help of the mobile
application “GPS coordinate”, which allowed a map preparation
and also nd the satellite location in Google Earth of each of the
properties at the páramo agroecosystem. These farms were delimited
with a perimeter of 51.25 km and a total area of 120.87 km
2
(gure 1).
Figure 1. Location of Cerrito municipality in Santander and in
Colombia.
Data collection techniques
Using a participatory action methodology, a questionnaire was
applied to 15 sheep farmers selected by intentional non-probabilistic
sampling, in which three dimensions were taken into account:
economic, social and environmental. Questionnaire was validated by
two experts in the area of animal husbandry and productive projects.
Then, with the participation of sheep farmers, sustainability
variables were selected, through a participatory workshop and
application of diagnostic tools, under a focus group technique, which
Jaimes
et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023 40(1): e234002
seeks to collect data through a semi-structured group survey that
revolves around around a theme proposed by the researcher (Rodas
and Pacheco, 2020).
Data analysis techniques
Univariate statistical techniques: frequency distribution and
measures of central tendency (according to the nature of the data)
were used through the SPSS V24 program, which allowed the initial
characterization of the sheep production system to be carried out.
Before the sustainability evaluation, sheep farmers selected by
consensus the variables that they considered most important, and
then, they proceeded to rank them and these results were represented
in a biogram or spider web graph, which shows a multidimensional
diagram with the representation of the respective indices, and indicate
the “state” of the agricultural production systems, since each radius
(axis) represents a calculation indicator. The diagram was made using
Excel 365 V16 program. In this case, each radius had a maximum value
of 10, so each indicator ranged from 0 to 10, which were assigned in
consensus by the producers during the development of the workshops
(Barrantes et al., 2018). In this way, according to the shaded area in
the graph, it was possible to identify indicators in collapse (values less
than 2), in a critical situation (between 2 and 4), unstable (between
4 and 6), stable (between 6 and 8) and optimal situation (between 8
and 10). Finally, strategic guidelines were proposed to respond to the
critical points of sustainability in these systems.
Results y discusion
Figure 2 shows the “veredas” or villages located in the páramo
ecosystem, False Corral is the one that predominates with the greatest
number of sheep production systems in the Mortiño sector, followed
by Tierra Negra sector, which its heights above sea level range from
2,865 to 4,150 meters, this implies a strong adaptation and resilience
of the sheep species to climatic and altitude conditions (Petryna and
Bayer, 2011).
Figure 2. Number of farms or properties by each villages in the
Cerrito municipality, department of Santander.
Characterization of Sheep Production System
Social dimension
The 93 % of respondents are male and their average age is 47±12
years. 47 % of the farms can be reached by road and the rest by tertiary
roads and bridle paths, because the accesses to the farms cannot be
intervened due toit is a protected páramo area. It stands out that 60 %
of the sheep farmers are owners of their houses, the average number
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023, 40(1): e234002. Enero-Marzo. ISSN 2477-9407.
4-7 |
of people who share the house is approximately 4. The school level
of the majority is primary and secondary (67 %), aliated to the
Potential Identication System Beneciaries of Social Programs of
Colombia (SISBEN), classied in levels I and II. The source of
income comes from agricultural and livestock activities (66 %);
93 % state that they have not received any support from entities or
organizations. An advantage of the production systems in the study
area is that most of them are owners of their farms, so they take
care of animal welfare and the environment where they live as an
integral approach to the production system. The level of schooling
observed is important when it comes to developing income-
generating activities.
Economic dimensión
Most of the production systems (74 %) of the Cerrito sheep
farmers developed a mixed production activity (table 1), that is,
they combine several production purposes such as wool, meat and
breeding. Likewise, it was observed that the sheep breeds that are
handled the most are Romney marsh, Hampshire and Moro, which
are characteristic of this moorland area because they are resilient
to the climate and also provide wool and meat, as well as for sale
as breeding stock, contributing to the food security of the área; by
tradition, they carry out this activity in the dierent stages of the
species, generating meat for sale and consumption, and wool that
they market for further processing.
Table 1. Production systems in Cerrito municipality.
Tipe of productive system Frecuency % Acumulative %
Mixed (Wool, Meat, Breed) 11 74 74
Double Purpose 2 13 87
Integral 2 13 100
Total 15 100
The average farm size of the sheep farmers was registered in
47±53 ha, however, this variability is an indication that more than
half of these producers have small extensions of land, consistent
information with the fact that 53 % of the participants have less
than 32 sheep/farm, 20 % have between 45 and 60 animals and
only the remaining (27 %) have more than 150 sheep/farm with a
maximum of 398 animals (table 2). Likewise, it is highlighted that
a large extension of each property is used for livestock based on
natural pastures.
In this sense, it was observed that natural pastures area
predominates, data consistent with (Aristizábal, 2019), who states
that most of the mountainous areas of the national territory are
suitable for raising sheep and goats. On the other hand, it was
observed that the existence of improved pastures is reduced or
minimal due to the climatic and agroecological conditions of the
páramo sector, likewise, because of the traditional culture that
they maintain in the sheep activity of the región, sheep production
in this region is combined with other livestock species and some
agricultural activities, contributing to the food security of families
and the territory (table 2).
Environmental dimension
In this dimension, the availability and use of water resources
was addressed, observing that four out of ve sheep farmers have
the culture of managing water reserves for human consumption,
only few producers are supplied by the aqueduct. The streams are
the main source of water in the majority of sheep farms, giving
domestic use as human and animal consumption, including during
the summer periods. As a second alternative they have springs,
wells and “Jagüeyes” or supercial water reservoirs that are used
mainly for animal management (table 3). 80 % of the producers
implement dierent mechanisms to conserve and preserve the water
sources that are used for animal consumption.
Table 2. Distribution of land use for properties in the
municipality of Cerrito.
Land use Average area (ha)
Total 47 ± 53
Natural pastures 19 ± 16
Improved pastures 5 ± 4
Livestock 24 ± 14
Others species 10 ± 9
Crops 7 ± 9
Conservation 17 ± 10
Table 3. Sources of water used by sheep farmers in Cerrito
municipality for human and animal consumption and
for agricultural activities.
Uses Source Frecuency (%)
Preservation/conservation
of water sources
Yes
No
12
3
80
20
Domestic use
Aqueduct 2 14
River ravine 9 60
River source 2 13
Well 2 13
Animal use
River ravine 11 73
Supercial water
reservoirs
3 20
River ravine and
Supercial water
reservoirs
1 7
Summer use
Animals
River ravine 5 34
River source 5 33
Well 5 33
Irrigation
River ravine 5 33
River source 3 20
Well 3 20
Did not answer 4 27
Participatory identication of variables for the sustainability
evaluation
In the meetings with focus groups, a consensus was reached
together with the sheep farmers to determine the variables regarding
the three dimensions addressed
The sustainability evaluation in these three dimensions allowed
to approach the sheep production system from a holistic and integral
perspective and not only from the productive aspects or parameters.
This is how sustainability contemplates aspects of social order
that involve variables of the producer and his family, while the
environmental variable focuses on the rational use of available
natural resources. These two variables have a direct impact and are
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Jaimes et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023 40(1): e234002
5-7 |
related to the economic dimension that is based on the indicators of
the production process.
Table 4. Dimensions and variables of sustainability.
Dimension Variable
Economical
Natural mating (NM) Record of information (RI)
Animal Supplements (AS)
Mixed production system de
(MPS)
Raw material costs for animal feed (RMC)
Social
Type of support received
(TSR)
Use of veterinary services (UVS)
Schooling grade (SG) Home ownership (HO)
Food safety (FS)
Ambiental
Water sources (WS) Use of energy sources (UES)
Soil conservation practices
(SCP)
Soil management-land use (SMLU)
Sustainability evaluation
Despite the fact, that dierent studies have been developed to
evaluate the sustainability of sheep production systems, a consensus
has not been generated in order to establishes a set of indicators
for universal use; Therefore, the use of indicators as a part of a
multicriteria analysis allows quantifying the dierent aspects related
to the productive systems (Vargas et al., 2022).
Figure 3 shows the spider web graph for the economic dimension.
Five variables were evaluated for this dimension and it was possible
general observe an optimal behavior for the development in this
dimensión, since most of the variables are in a state named “stable”
(RI, MPS, NM) and “optimal” (RMC). However, it is important
to pay attention to the food supplement variable (AS) that is in a
“critical” state, then a critical problem or knot is being evidenced for
the economic dimension in these productive systems.
Figure 3. Spider web graph for the economic dimension. NM:
natural mating; AS: animal supplements; RMC: raw
materials costs for animal feeding; RI: record of
information; MPS: mixed production system.
Velázquez (2019), evaluated sustainability of three sheep
production systems, indicating that the processes of productive
diversication and marketing are essential in the economic dimension
of the productive unit. The record of information is a key tool
that allows the producer to make the correct decision-making by
generating indicators that lead to constant monitoring, evaluation and
feedback of the productive system. At the nancial level, accounting
records will allow the producer to have solid foundations that direct
him to estimate real production costs and determine the prot margin
of the production system.
In the social dimension, ve variables were evaluated (gure
4) and it was possible to observe that most of the variables are in a
critical state named “unstable” (SG) and “collapse” (UVS, TSR). The
use of veterinary medicines becomes a limitation for many of these
production systems due to the high costs its represent, becoming a
problema, that in the long term can lead to health problems for the
animals and nally to economic losses that aect family income of
these producers. The type of support received by the producers is
limited, although, they have the help of goverment entities for the
provision of veterinary services, such as the UMATA (Municipal
Units of Agricultural Technical Assistance), the long distances
between their properties and the municipal head mean that they do not
go to them, taking as a solution to implement all kinds of of empirical
maneuvers to treat and save their cattle.
Velázquez (2019), mentions that the social sustainability of sheep
production systems represents a great impact on the quality of life of
both the producer and the people related to this economic sector. This
is how, knowledge transfer activities and incentives are fundamental
in order to lead to the improvement of the productive processes
themselves.
Figure 4. Spider web graph for the social dimensión. UVS: Use
of veterinary services; HO: Home ownership; TSR: type
of support received; SG: Schooling grade, FS: food safety.
There were four variables for the environmental dimension
(gure 5), one of them in a critical state named “unstable” (UES). The
current state of the variable related to the use of energy sources places
it in a condition that shows the limited access that sheep farmers have
to this, especially those that represent an environmental benet (solar
energy, wind energy, hydraulic power, etc.).
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023, 40(1): e234002. Enero-Marzo. ISSN 2477-9407.
6-7 |
Figure 5. Spider web graph for the environmental dimensión.
UES: use of energy sources; SMLU: Soil management-
land use; WS: water fsources, SCP; soil conservation
practices.
The environmental dimension (EnD) is especially oriented to
the process of management and conservation of resources such as
water sources and soil (Velázquez, 2019). Alternative energy sources
are necessary especially for small and medium farmers that lead to
optimize the use of resources and therefore to improve the prot
margin.
Finally, gure 6 shows the index obtained for each dimension,
showing that the economic (ED) and environmental dimensions are
generally in an optimal state, while the social dimension (SD) is in a
state of instability in the production systems. Thus, it is important to
focus attention on the variables of the SD since, in order to advance
towards the development of sustainable sheep production systems,
it is necessary to improve the aspects involved into the viability and
permanence of sheep producers (Chiappe, 2001).
Strategic guidelines for sustainable sheep production
In the environmental dimension, something very important to
note is that sheep are able to survive in a wide variety of climates and
environments and enhance agricultural production in both developed
and underdeveloped regions of the world (Redden and Thorne, 2020).
So a sustainable future for sheep and goat production is perceived
by promoting the utilization of grasses and forages, grazed in situ,
using resources such as hill land that cannot sustain other productive
enterprises (McCoard et al., 2019)
In the economic dimension, it is proposed to have sheep breeders
according to genetic plan (meat and wool); the implementation of
articial insemination protocols and early weaning to stimulate early
estrus in ewes; crossbreeding strategies in search of productivity and
added value; stabilization of the ow of ewes (inows = outows);
among others strategies. A signicant contribution that makes visible
the problems that the Agricultural and Rural Sector is going through,
is strictly related to the lack of protability in most productive
activities, and at a greater disadvantage for small and medium
producers. Therefore, it is proposed to develop productive projects
through the association of sheep farmers to bring resources to the
community in order to promote the improvement of productivity and
competitiveness of regional production.
Finally, the social dimension includes training to farmers on the
implementation of sanitary, nutritional and management plans with
the participation of the family nucleus; certication in good livestock
and animal welfare practices; and the promotion of rural tourism,
ecotourism and adventure tourism as a way to bring communities
closer together through activities of coexistence and interaction in all
social, cultural and productive expressions of daily life.
Conclusions
Characterization showed a low schooling grade and a lack of
support received from state entities for sheep farmers, a situation that
leads to a lack of technication in the production systems and has an
impact on the momentum of the production chain. On the other hand,
most producers focus on marketing wool and taking advantage of the
animal’s discard stages to obtain economic income from the sale of
meat. Optimal production parameters obtained in the breeding system
is related to the availability of water, which is obtained from water
sources such as streams. However, given the limited availability of
water resources, producers resort to using wells and supercial water
reservoirs in the soil.
The evaluation of the sustainability of sheep systems made it
possible to establish their critical points. In this case, critical points
were identied for the economic dimension (feed supplements and
animal housing systems), the social dimension (type of government
support received and use of veterinary services) and the environmental
dimension (use of energy sources).
It was also possible to establish the favorable points for the
sustainability of production systems in the economic dimension (cost
of raw materials), social dimension (food security) and environmental
dimension (soil conservation practices and water sources), showing
that sheep production in páramo agroecosystems is viable to generate
food security, taking into account the care of water sources and soil
conservation, while improving the quality of life and living conditions
of families. In this way, this system of small livestock production is a
signicant item for small and medium-sized producers, contributing
to social, economic and environmental development.
Figure 6. Web plots for economic dimension (ED), social
dimension (SD) and environmental dimension (EnD).
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Jaimes et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2023 40(1): e234002
7-7 |
It is necessary to focus attention on the critical points mentioned
above and apply the strategic guidelines generated for each of them,
since, together with the favorable points, they will make possible to
generate and establish more sustainable sheep production systems.
Literature cited
Alcaldía municipal (2020). Plan de desarrollo municipal Cerrito Santander. https://
cerritosantander.micolombiadigital.gov.co/sites/cerritosantander/content/
les/000541/27031_plan-de-desarrollo-2020.pdf
Aristizábal, B. M. (2019). Agronegocios. Ovinos en Colombia producen cerca
de 15.000 toneladas de carne al año: https://www.agronegocios.co/
ganaderia/ovinos-en-colombia-producen-cerca-de-15000-toneladas-de-
carne-al-ano-2891243
Avendaño Rodríguez, V. A., & Navarro Ortiz, C. A. (2020). Alimentación de ovinos
en regiones del trópico en Colombia. Revista Sistemas de Producción
Agroecológicos, 11(2), 71–108. https://doi.org/10.22579/22484817.471
Barrantes, C., Siura, S., Castillo, E., Huarcaya, M., y Rado, J. (2018). Manual
para el análisis Agricultura Familiar. http://repositorio.iica.int/
handle/11324/7035
Chávez-Espinoza, M., Cantú-Silva, I., González-Rodríguez, H., & Montañez-
Valdez, O. D. (2022). Small ruminant production systems in Mexico and
their eect on productive sustainability. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 27(1),
e2246.
Chiappe, M. B. (2001). Dimensiones sociales de la agricultura sustentable.
Ediciones Cientícas Americanas, 61–76. http://www.dedicaciontotal.
udelar.edu.uy/adjuntos/produccion/965_academicas__academicaarchivo.
pdf
Contreras, J. (2021). Retos alimentarios 2030: Objetivos, recomendaciones…
alternativas y realidades. Journal of Behavior and Feeding, 1(1), 86-95.
http://148.202.248.171/revistaiican/index.php/JBF/article/view/18
Dutruel Florencia J., De caro Adriana E. J. (2019). Producción ovina en la
Mesopotamia Argentina: acciones y políticas desarrolladas para el sector.
Agronomía y Ambiente, 39(1). http://agronomiayambiente.agro.uba.ar/
index.php/AyA/article/view/93
Martínez-Castillo, R. (2009). Sistemas de producción agrícola sostenible. Revista
Tecnología En Marcha, 22(2), pág. 23. https://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.
php/tec_marcha/article/view/114
McCoard, S. A., Stevens, D. R., & Whitney, T. R. (2019). Sustainable sheep
and goat production through strategic nutritional management and
advanced technologies. Animal Agriculture: Sustainability, Challenges
and Innovations, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-
6.00013-6
Organización de las Naciones Unidas, ONU. (2018) Objetivos de desarrollo
sostenible, Objetivo 12: Producción y Consumo Responsables. https://
www.un.org/es/impacto-acad%C3%A9mico/page/objetivos-de-
desarrollo-sostenible
Petryna, A., y Bayer, W. (2011). El Clima Y Los Ovinos En La Patagonia . 1–8.
Pulido, M., Barrena-González, J., Badgery, W., Rodrigo-Comino, J., & Artemi,
C. (2018). Pastoreo sostenible. Opinión actual en ciencias ambientales y
salud, 5, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.004
Quiroga, M. R. (2001). CEPAL. Obtenido de Indicadores de sostenibilidad
ambiental y de desarrollo sostenible: estado del arte y perspectivas: http://
hdl.handle.net/11362/5570
Redden, R., y Thorne, J. W. (2020). Reproductive management of sheep and
goats. Animal Agriculture: Sustainability, Challenges and Innovations,
211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817052-6.00012-4
Rodas Pacheco, F. D., & Pacheco Salazar, V. G. (2020). Grupos Focales: Marco
de Referencia para su Implementación. INNOVA Research Journal, 5(3),
182–195. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v5.n3.2020.1401
Sarandón, S. J. . (2021). Agroecología: una revolución del pensamiento en las
ciencias agrarias. Ciencia, tecnología y política, 4(6), 055. https://doi.
org/10.24215/26183188e055
Vargas Romero, J. M., Soto Ortiz, U. G., Losada Custardoy, H. R., Cortés
Zorrilla, J., Vieyra Durán, J. E., Alemán López, V., & Luna Rodríguez, L.
(2022). Sostenibilidad en sistemas de producción ovina del municipio de
Ixmiquilpan, estado Hidalgo, México. Revista Iberoamericana Ambiente
& Sustentabilidad, 5, e241. https://doi.org/10.46380/rias.vol5.e241
Velázquez, B. (2019). Análisis de la sostenibilidad utilizando indicadores
de la metodología MESMIS en unidades productivas ovinas de la
subregión oriente o metropolitana y suroriente del Departamento de
Norte de Santander. http://repositoriodspace.unipamplona.edu.co/jspui/
bitstream/20.500.12744/2845/1/Vel%c3%a1squez_2019_TG.pdf