Policies on prevention and eradication of land mafia: Agrarian reform in Indonesia

D GINTING

Resumen


ABSTRACT

 

One of the main causes of land disputes is due to the actions of the land mafia. The purpose of this research is to analyze and formulate policies on the prevention and eradication of the land mafia in Indonesia. The method used is qualitative research, and this type of research is included in the category of library research, and the research approach is descriptive-analytic. While the data analysis technique in this study uses the Miles and Huberman models, the conclusion from this study is that land dispute resolution cannot be made legally in Anich.


Palabras clave


Agrarian reform, eradication, land mafia, prevention.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


ADITJONDRO, GJ (1993). Dimensi-dimensi Politis Sengketa Tanah. Makalah pada Latihan Analisis Sosial Tanah, Medan: Wahana Informasi Masyarakat (WIM)-Akafjga.

BUCHANAN, A (2017). “A critical introduction to Rawls’ theory of justice”. In Distributive Justice, pp. 175-211. Routledge.

GINTING, D (2016). “Resolution of Land Disputes in a Perspective of Indonesia’s Land Lawa Reformation”. International Journal Of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14(1).

FU, H & GILLESPIE, J (2014). Resolving Land Disputes in East Asia: Exploring the Limits of Law. Cambridge University Press.

GALISANKA, A (2019). John Rawls: The Path to a Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

HARSONO, B (2015). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. BUKU DOSEN-2014.

ISMAIL, N (2007). Perkembangan hukum pertanahan, pendekatan ekonomi politik. Kerjsama HuMa dan Magister Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta.

LAUREANO, RMS, FERNANDES, AL, HASSAMO, S, & ALTURAS, B (2018). “Facebook Satisfaction and Its Impacts on Fundraising”: A Case Study at a Portuguese Non-Profit Organization. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(1), pp. 4-7.

MUSTAFIN, AN, SHLYAKHTIN, AE & KOTULIČ, R (2019). “Role of public management in elimination regional disparities”, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), pp. 260-270.

NUGRAHANI, F & HUM, M (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books.

PAKES, F (2019). Comparative criminal justice. Routledge.

RAWLS, J (2009). A theory of justice. Harvard university press.

ROBERTS, J (2018). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge.

SODIKI, A, HUDA, M, ANA, NR & ALI, MM (2013). Politik hukum agraria. Konstitusi Press (Konpress).

SOLOVYEV, VD, IVANOV, VV & AKHTIAMOV, RB (2019). “Dictionary of Abstract and Concrete Words of the Russian Language: A Methodology for Creation and Application1”, Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10, pp. 215-227.

SULISTYOWATI, H (2017). MORAL REFORM BUREAUCRACY AS PREVENTION OF ILLEGAL PAYMENTS TO INDONESIA CLEAN OF CORRUPTION. The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020.

SYRIF, E (2012). Menuntaskan Sengketa Tanah melalui Pengadilan Khusus Pertanahan. Jakarta: PT.

WESOLY, M & CIOSEK, P (2018). “Comparison of various data analysis techniques applied for the classification of pharmaceutical samples by electronic tongue”. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 267, 570-580.

WIDJANARKO, BS (2017). “PREVENTING LAND MAFIA USING POSITIVE LAND REGISTRY SYSTEM”. The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020.




Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.

Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social / Centro de Estudios Sociológicos y Antropológicos (CESA) / Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales / Universidad del Zulia-Venezuela

El único correo por el cual se reciben artículos y preguntas es utopraxislat@gmail.com

e-Mail <<utopraxislat@gmail.com>> is the only means to submission papers

 

 ISSN: 1316-5216 / e-ISSN: 2477-9555

ReviCyHLUZ


Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.