Assessment of organizations readiness for networking collaboration

Palabras clave: Innovation network, participants, readiness for network interaction, method of main components. Red de innovación, participantes, disponibilidad para la interacción de la red, método de componentes principales.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

The paper investigates the organization's readiness to network interaction while implementing innovation activities. The inclination to take part is being analyzed with the use of factors, including the “organization competency profile”, “organization flexibility”, “media relevance of organization data on the Internet” and “level of development of the organization’s cooperative relationships”. The process of the quantitative data is carried out with the help of the main components method, the functionality is realized with the implementation of the FactoMinerR software package. As a result, the ranked data on 109 relevant organizations, revealing their predisposition to the cooperation of the innovation network.

 

RESUMEN

El documento investiga la preparación de la organización para interactuar en red. La inclinación a participar se está analizando con el uso de factores, que incluyen el "perfil de competencia de la organización", la "flexibilidad de la organización", la "relevancia mediática de los datos de la organización en Internet" y el "nivel de desarrollo de las relaciones de cooperación de la organización". El procesamiento de los datos cuantitativos se realiza con el método de componentes principales, la funcionalidad se realiza con el paquete de software FactoMinerR. Los datos clasificados de 109 organizaciones relevantes, revelando su predisposición a la cooperación de la red de innovación.

Biografía del autor/a

A.R. SADRIEV, Kazan Federal University, Kazan
Azat Rafailovich Sadriev is the Doctor of Philosophy at Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation (main employee). The research areas are Engineering Social, Sciences Arts and Humanities Economics, Econometrics and Finance Business, Management and Accounting Multidisciplinary Environmental Science. There are eleven Documents by the author in this area until now.
B.N. KAMAEV, Kazan Federal University, Kazan
Bulat Nailevich Kamaev is the Doctor of Philosophy and received higher education at Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation. The research areas are Social Sciences Arts and Humanities Engineering Economics, Econometrics and Finance Business, Management and Accounting. There are three Documents by the author in this area until now.

Citas

ANNÍA G, María Eugenia., VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, José Vicente., ROMERO PABÓN, Julio Cesar., RAMÍREZ MOLINA, Reynier Israel., & RAMOS MARTÍNEZ, Yanelis. (2018). “Conciencia ética en organizaciones universitarias: un estudio fenomenológico de la praxis como continua formación”. In Revista Inclusiones, 5(4), pp. 179-195.

AHMADI, R, & MOVAHED, SAHS (2019). “Study of Artificial Neural Networks in Information Security Risk Assessment”. UCT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 7(02), pp. 1-10.

BARGE-GIL, A (2010). “Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of the degree of openness”. Industry and innovation, 17(6), pp. 577-607.

DAHLANDER, L, & GANN, DM (2010). “How open is innovation?”. Research Policy, 39(6), pp. 699-709.

ELMQUIST, M, FREDBERG, T, & OLLILA, S (2009). “Exploring the field of open innovation”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), pp. 326-345.

ENKEL, E, GASSMANN, O, & CHESBROUGH, H (2009). “Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon”. R&d Management, 39(4), pp. 311-316.

ERMOLAEV, KA, MELNIK, AN, & KUZMIN, MS (2017). “Energy efficiency policy activating in Russia by project management methods”. Revista Publicando, 4(13 (3)), pp. 810-822.

HENKEL, J (2006). “Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux”. Research Policy, 35(7), pp. 953-969.

LAY RABY, N.D., RAMÍREZ MOLINA, Reynier Israel., & VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J.V. (2019). Sociología y discapacidad en el contexto laboral en Chile. First edition. Editorial Centro Internacional de Marketing Territorial para la Educación y el Desarrollo CIMTED. Medellín-Colombia.

LAURSEN, K, & SALTER, A (2006). “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms”. Strategic management journal, 27(2), pp. 131-150.

LAZZAROTTI, V, & MANZINI, R (2009). “Different modes of open innovation: a theoretical framework and an empirical study”. International journal of innovation management, 13(04), pp. 615-636.

LICHTENTHALER, U (2011). “Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions”. Academy of management perspectives, 25(1), pp. 75-93.

MARAGHEH, SP, AZAR, ML, & MOLLABASHI, FA (2019). “Islamic Iranian Architecture in Various Zones of Iran Dessert Cities From a Social Point”. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 7(01), pp. 6-12.

MARTÍNEZ, Suyis; RAMOS MARTÍNEZ, Yanelis y ANNÍA, María Eugenia. (2019). El coaching en educación. Utilidad para la transformación escolar mediante sistematización de experiencias. In Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. Año 35, No. 89-2: 1388-1439. Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo (Venezuela).

MARTINS, D, ASSIS, R, COELHO, R, & ALMEIDA, F (2019). “Decision Support System for Business Ideas Competitions”. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 4(3).

NALBANDI, H, & ZONOOZI, SJ (2019). “Determine the Impact of Market-orientated Skill Training on Satisfaction and Effectiveness of Trainees in Technical and Vocational Training: A Case Study in Western Azarbaijan Province, Iran”. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 3(1).

RAMÍREZ MOLINA, Reynier Israel., CHACÓN ZÚÑIGA, H.C., & El KADI JANBEIH, O. N. (2018). Gestión estratégica del talento humano en las PYMES. First edition. Editorial Corporación CIMTED. Medellín-Colombia.

RINCÓN, Yanyn; SUKIER, Harold; CONTRERAS, Jairo & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, Reynier Israel. (2019). “Responsible Communication Strategies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”. In Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. Vol. 35, No.89-2: 1208-1234. Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo (Venezuela).

RAMOS MARTÍNEZ, Yanelis. (2007). Estrategias de la gestión directiva y construcción de la grandeza docente en las escuelas bolivarianas. In Revista electrónica de humanidades, educación y comunicación social, (REDHECS). Edición 2, año 2.

OZMAN, M (2011). “Modularity, industry life cycle and open innovation”. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(1), pp. 26-34.

PILLER, FT, & WALCHER, D (2006). “Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development”. R&d Management, 36(3), pp. 307-318.

REVISAN, AL, RIBEIRO, AJ, & PONTE, JPD (2020). “Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program”. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2).

SADRIEV, AR, KUZMIN, MS, & ANISIMOVA, TY (2017). “Public-Private Partnership in the sphere of Energy Efficiency Enhancement”. Revista Publicando, 4(13 (3)), pp. 928-938.

SANDULLI, FD, & CHESBROUGH, H (2009). “The two sides of open business models”. Available at SSRN 1325682.

TROTT, P, & HARTMANN, DAP (2009). “Why' open innovation old wine in new bottles”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), pp. 715-736.

VILLALOBOS, J., GUERRERO, J., & ROMERO, L. (2019). “Hermenéutica de la política y legitimidad de su ejercicio: democracia y Estado de derecho”. In Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana. Año: 24, No. 86: 182-197, Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo Venezuela.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, José Vicente & GANGA CONTRERAS, Francisco. 2018. “Tecnoempresa y Tecnocimiento: Una Perspectiva desde la Bioética Empresarial”. In Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science. Vol. 7, No. 3: 214-230. Unievangélica Centro Universitario, (Brasil).

VILLALLOBOS ANTÚNEZ, José Vicente & GANGA, Francisco. (2016). “Bioética, dignidad e intertemporalidad de los Bioderechos Humanos”. In Revista de Filosofía. Vol. 83, Nº. 2: 7-24.

WEST, J, & GALLAGHER, S (2006). “Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open‐source software”. R&d Management, 36(3), pp. 319-331.

Publicado
2019-12-19
Cómo citar
SADRIEV, A., & KAMAEV, B. (2019). Assessment of organizations readiness for networking collaboration. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(1), 324-334. Recuperado a partir de https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/30334